Capitalism π€·ββοΈ
That's why the Saudi's aren't going to piss off the US, China, Russia, or India. Their strategy only works in peacetime.
zephyreks
joined 1 year ago
Sure, but it ends up being extreme even for Reddit. There's no discourse, it's just everyone nodding along and agreeing.
They're ditching the USD's role as the global reserve currency. Any reduction in reliance on the USD directly impacts the USD's role as a reserve currency.
You don't have to go "I'm never touching the USD again" to ditch it in it's key use case.
That's because the AIIB is actually making progress pulling people out of poverty instead of instituting austerity measures like the IMF is keen to do.
All the articles about foreign meddling coming out of the big tech giants are written by "independent think tanks" that are conspicuously made up mostly of ex-US intelligence. That should tell you enough.
I would actually love to see Saudi Arabia take the lead on food engineering. They might lack fresh water, but they have immense amounts of land and sun to play with.
The only alternative I can see is a mass reforestation project.
Wasn't Russia expecting Ukraine to capitulate (basically, like what Armenia did against Azerbaijan)?
They only sent, what, 80000 troops on the initial drive to Kyiv?
Russia's military budget in 2019 was $65 billion. It's a waste of money that's only practical because the US is literally swimming in taxpayer money (mostly because the US doesn't invest in itself, but that's another issue).
Macron was right, but being right is extremely expensive. Meanwhile, the EU's dependence on F-35s for defence isn't too great given the well-known issues with F-35 maintenance and the need for US private contractors in the maintenance loop.
lemmy.world is such a cesspool I don't understand it
Same thing is happening to India before our eyes.
Thing is, the Western view that media is free inherently makes people more susceptible to propaganda. To be more precise, Western media has achieved a few things: (1) The illusion of media freedom makes people less likely to question the media they consume. (2) The profit-driven motive of media companies makes it more likely for facts to be "reinterpreted" to better fit the target reader's worldview. (3) The extent that government agencies are involved in media has been completely hidden from the public.
view more: next βΊ
I mean, that's the entire point, right? Media doesn't exist to show the truth, it exists to manufacture consent for some policy direction. If media was supposed to be factual, it wouldn't be funded by biased actors and it wouldn't have an incentive structure that rewards profits more than factual reporting.