GenZedong

4298 readers
236 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
26
27
 
 

The rise of Trump and Trumpism cannot be fully explained without first recognizing how, over the last two decades, American politics has been shaped by the rise of China.

Despite both parties preferring to deemphasize foreign policy in their campaigns, US foreign policy is the engine driving domestic policy. This is because modern US domestic politics is fundamentally a game of dividing up the plunder that foreign policy secures.

This plunder arrives in the form of persistent federal govt budget deficits which are maintained via the exorbitant privilege of the US dollar’s position as global reserve currency, an arrangement forced upon the rest of the globe in the ashes of the world wars of last century.

Since WW2, this unilateral global arrangement has been maintained through a mixture of brute force, monopoly control of global institutions, and a healthy dose of quid pro quo with its junior partners that comprise the western world.

In the same way that domestic politics is downstream of foreign policy, US elections are downstream of real disagreements amongst factions within the US bourgeoisie. The two political parties represent the diverging PR strategies by which empire is sold to the underclasses.

The increasing polarization of mainstream domestic politics can thus be attributed not to the rise of social media, “foreign interference”, or other facile explanations liberal pundits offer, but rather to a real divergence in imperial strategy given life by partisan jockeying.

Historically, the factions comprising this divide have been the domestic bourgeoisie+petit bourg. elements on one side and the financial/international bourg. on the other.

Until recently, the former was given political form by the GOP, the latter by the Dems.

But over the past year, the tech giants that account for a sizable portion of Dem party backing appeared to switch sides and coalesce their support behind Trump.

What caused this sudden shift?

In a word: China

For years, China represented both a massive labor and manu. hub for US outsourcing, and a massive consumer market for US-branded goods.

But recently–-accelerated by US tariffs and the pandemic–-Chinese-branded goods have begun out-competing those from the US.

As a result, Silicon Valley—which has historically seen their interests best served by Dem-led foreign policy—are now casting their lot with Trump and his more openly hostile stance toward China.

Musk’s open campaigning for Trump really only makes sense in light of his (correct) anticipation that China’s domestic manufacturers will rapidly overtake Tesla as the worldwide leader in EVs.

Thus, in just a few years, America’s tech giants have shifted from seeking to maintain China as a market and manufacturing hub, to finding themselves facing a formidable competitor. In this way, they are now in a similar position the US domestic bourg. faced decades prior.

With both major factions in US capital now under increasing threat of competition from the same source, capital is unified in backing the horse they believe has the winning strategy: open confrontation with China.

American liberals have largely failed to notice this sudden alignment of capital behind Trump because their lofty rhetoric serves only to obscure their own view of US imperial policy and are thus unable to understand the source of the apparent decay.

Liberals didn’t dislike Bush because he killed a million Iraqis, but because of the gaffs and embarrassment he brought to the office. He struck a blow at the heart of liberal identity, which is heavily tied to a perceived sense of respectability of US empire. Trump does the same.

But from the perspective of the rest of the world, the neoliberal era was the aberration.

Trump represents a return to an era of more honest US politics without the sneering veneer of respectability liberals value. An era of open hostility to secure naked self-interest.

Contrary to what frustrated liberal pundits will assert tomorrow, Americans as a whole aren't "dumb", which is often a lazy way of accusing groups of “voting against their own self-interest”. Trump voters are very aware of what they are getting with Trump.

Liberals may pull out their hair and point toward Trump’s unapologetic self-interest as proof of his unsuitability for the role.

But this self-interest is exactly what his voters ordered, and hope he will deliver.

It has been said that “liberalism is capitalism’s lying smile, fascism is capitalism’s honest fists”.

Americans have once again voted for the fists, and this time, it appears they have a majority of US capital behind them

28
 
 

Please check out this channel, they are doing great work. This channel is stocked with accessible but cutting edge educational material.

29
 
 

Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.

Matrix homeserver and space
Theory discussion group on Matrix
Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive, libgen

30
 
 

Good presentation.

31
 
 

TrueAnon turned me into a truther. Am I crazy?

32
 
 

With help from our very own @[email protected] to help explain some of the maidan coup

33
 
 
34
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6081318

Aye, and more shenanigans and hand-wringing from the Democrats too.

35
 
 

Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.

Matrix homeserver and space
Theory discussion group on Matrix
Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive, libgen

36
37
 
 

A great video from a great channel

38
 
 

Just letting you know

39
 
 

Your thoughts?

Cheers!

40
 
 

The group of countries invited to join the BRICS as "partner states" includes Turkey, Indonesia, Algeria, Belarus, Cuba, Bolivia, Malaysia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Vietnam, Nigeria, and Uganda.

The BRICS countries have agreed to include 13 nations in the category of "partner states" in the association. However, the entry of these countries will not be made official during the summit. According to this definition, the Russian presidency will hold consultations with the partner countries to make membership of the BRICS official. The figure was confirmed earlier by Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov.

https://www.brasildefato.com.br/2024/10/24/brics-approves-cuba-bolivia-and-11-other-countries-as-partner-states.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c624m4kgrg3o?

Edit: same seems to be true for Nicaragua. https://voz.us/en/world/241023/17479/venezuela-and-nicaragua-would-be-left-out-of-brics-at-lula-s-request.html

41
 
 

Despite no longer identifying with liberalism, I still make liberal mistakes. I have caught myself multiple times at this point saying that China is not doing this or that to help Cuba, or Palestine, or to combat some domestic issue. Then I do some digging and it turns out they are actually doing something.

As an example, I thought that China was abandoning Cuba with its energy crisis, but they are actually building solar plants. There are still problems, since the plants will take time to open, and still only provide a fraction of the energy Cuba needs, but this is just one project. I am sure there are more things going on behind the scenes which I just haven't seen yet, because they aren't flashy enough to make it to the front page of the news.

Basically, what I am saying is that I spoke first and investigated latter. This is because I was being lazy. I just want to remind everybody to not repeat my mistakes.

42
43
 
 

This is fascinating.

Your thoughts?

44
45
46
 
 

Pyongyang, October 22 (KCNA) -- Kim Yo Jong, vice department director of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, issued the following press statement on Tuesday:

The reckless infringement upon the sovereignty of the DPRK by the ROK military gangsters is a hideous military provocation that can never be pardoned.

Seoul will have to experience at first hand so as to know properly how dangerous act it committed and how terrible and fatal the consequences it brought on itself are.

A military provocation against a nuclear weapons state may be led to horrible situation, unimaginable for politicians and military experts in any big or small country in the world with their normal thinking to experience. So, there will be no such instance except one recently made by lunatics of the ROK and Ukraine.

Such deed can be done only by lunatics in the Seoul and Kiev regimes.

Seoul and Kiev are exact counterparts in going about begging and letting loose reckless remarks against nuclear weapons states at random without follow-up capability.

It seems to be a common feature of bad dogs bred by the U.S.

The DPRK detective agencies' investigation into the drones from the ROK is going on and the truth behind the despicable provocation of the ROK military gangsters will be analyzed further in detail.

No one knows how our retaliation and revenge will be completed.

A lot of political motivational rubbish sent by the ROK scum was discovered and removed in many parts of the DPRK on October 21, too.

The brute courage of the Seoul authorities to jump into fire with brushwood on their backs, far from reflecting on their conducts and being prudent, will bring the danger of destruction of all the scum. And they will be denounced by everyone else. -0-

47
 
 

Leningrad, 1938


A worker and a supervisor, Moscow, 1954


Norilsk, 1965


Constitutional Crisis of 1993


Constitutional Crisis of 1993


"Put Chubais behind bars", 1998

48
 
 
49
 
 
50
 
 

Thoughts on this writing of Mao's?

It's about 45 minutes long or thereabouts.

"Oppose Stereotyped Party Writing"

Seems good for me as a Communications major.

view more: ‹ prev next ›