this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
817 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38578 readers
2030 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except fossil fuel production went UP when "renewable replaced nuclear".

While renewable was built out quite a bit and nuclear was decreased at roughly the same time, total demand has risen (as it tends to do) and that delta was filled by more fossil fuel production.

IMO (and many other peoples) the climate-positive approach would have been to keep nuclear, while building out renewables and phasing out fossil. And then try to build more renewables to get rid of nuclear, if that's still desired.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

this is the German power production for the last 30 years. Shutting down nuclear started in early 2000s

brown = brown coal, pink = black coal, grey = nuclear, yellow = gas, blue = oil, green = renewables

What I can read in this graphic is black coal and nuclear got phased out. Brown coal sunk a little bit and renewables multiplied their production.

Yes, I support your opinion, it would've been better having 25-30% nuclear power instead of coal. I guess this wasn't possible as nuclear always had a bad stance in Germany and coal was a big employer. Maybe a bit like Norway and its oil.

But at the point Germany is now or was a year ago it's way easier, cheaper and faster to invest in renewables instead of building new npp.