this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
39 points (97.6% liked)

Melbourne

1865 readers
50 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He remained in the car with her child while she was forced to make the purchases.

This is the bit I don't understand. How could he know she wouldn't involve police the moment he let her out of sight? I know there's the threat to the baby, but the risk he took there is unbelievable.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

We are not talking about a criminal mastermind here.

It is was a high-risk, low return heist. She could have called the police, liberated her baby, had the stores brick the laptops on purpose and he would have gotten nothing.

The way it was, he (as so far) managed to get away with hot, easily traceable goods and she has suffered a financial loss and serious trauma. No one will win in the long term.