this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
347 points (80.7% liked)
Political Memes
5429 readers
1394 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just repeating it and sticking your head in the sand doesn't make it so.
If you feel capable of refuting the point, lay out any example you can provide, that meets my original premise. Edit I provided a clear simple case to discuss the situation, which you haven't been able to refute.
(Edit: For clarity), I acknowledge many places in the US are NOT competitive, thus the scarce vote concept is much less relevant. Location was always in my comments, so that is not a goalpost move.
Ok Dr strange.
There are 2 competitive candidates for president. One of them WILL be president.
How you get there is a mix of direct and indirect actions. You do not seem able to grasp or refute that indirect actions can have an influence on the frontrunners.
That's on you.
you're inability to tell the truth plainly and without hyperbole or fallacy has resulted in you spreading election misinformation. all I've done here is try to keep the rhetoric honest
So not yet. No worries
this seems like pretty obvious trolling at this point
I stated my case, defended it, and provided conversational example of the position.
You deployed the "le redditor" debate club starter kit and now cry going foul. You even tried to directly misquote me and got called out.
Oopsie, sorry you bungled this.
this mischaracterization of the facts serves only to protect your ego. anyone who reads this thread will know exactly what happened.
We are reading it, we agree with the other guy. You're wrong and also appear arguing in bad faith or with the least possible effort.
If by inaction or dumb action you get the candidate elected that you least support, you have helped said candidate into office. You had the power to choose, and from their perspective you helped them. You can argue that by not supporting a candidate that's all you did, but the pyrrhic "victory" here is just moving the reference frame. Voting is teleological yo: why you did what you did doesn't matter, only the outcome does.
Lol and they are already voting accordingly.
Not sure what was deleted here cause mod notes don't include the referenced comment.
Anyway, you haven't done that, you've simply tried to make up lies by misquoting me, then intentionally not addressing the content of my comment.
how can I refuted a fiction, except by saying "you made that up"?
If you can't meet a toy case, you aren't ready to discuss the real world.
no more dismissal is needed: your stories are fictions.
Obviously. It's obviously a toy case to illustrate a point. You think I'm actually stating there are only 5 people voting?
I think you haven't told a true story yet.