this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
112 points (98.3% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3094 readers
425 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Jeep is launching a $25,000 EV in the US ‘very soon’ to revamp the rugged SUV brand

https://electrek.co/2024/05/29/jeep-launching-25000-ev-us-very-soon/

@evs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Recent? Jeeps have never been reliable

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh, bullshit. They were fine before the Fiat takeover.

I have 500k on a 98 GC 5.9L and 350k on the wife's 98 4.0L. I doubt they've been down for 5 days total in this millenium and both are driven every day.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I've never owned one, but I thought they were more reliable in the 1980s and '90s. Was I mistaken?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Up to being bought by Chrysler in 1984 they were pretty solid. Because they were so basic. Not much to break, since they were boxes with wheels and that's it. I had a 1990 YJ Wrangler and it was the biggest pile of shit I could imagine being assembled on purpose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In the 80's and 90's? That was peak junk car era. You'd be lucky to have a car not rust out or need major repairs well before 100k miles.

These fays, IF something breaks, it is extremely expensive to fix, but you can certainly expect to go a lot longer without a major problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Nah it was peak technology. We got things like fuel injection and ABS. There were standard radios. Components were simple, easy to diagnose, and inexpensive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Damn it, I hate how true this statement is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Wranglers have been mostly reliable but everything else has had issues. The newer pentastar engines seem to be doing pretty well. Not sure on the latest 4 cylinder engines or the Fiat models but the wrangler has been going pretty strong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The 3.6L Pentastar is widely known to have the head gasket leak after 100K miles. Should be a recall but Stellantis won’t recognize it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought that was limited to the Pacificas and everything else before they put it into the Wrangler. My understanding was that it was resolved by the time they finally started putting them in wranglers. I hated the older 3.8L engines and was super happy to get the 3.6. I still have low mileage so can’t comment on longevity but I think they may have resolved that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nope. Still a thing. Happened to my 7 year old.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How many miles did it have and if you don’t mind me asking, what did it cost to fix? Did you just get the head gasket replaced or did you have to get the heads machined or a reman engine?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

115K. Totaled the engine. Too far out of spec to machine. I wasn’t about to put more money into it. It was paid off too which sucked. Found out after the fact that this is a known defect on this engine. Note: it was not a Flex Fuel vehicle, or at least it wasn’t badged that way. Not sure if that affects anything reliability wise.