this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
157 points (94.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36168 readers
432 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

It's why I barely watch YouTube at all and mostly read news and get frustrated if the only source is a fucking YouTube video.

You know what's really easy to cite? A text document.

You know what's not so easy to cite? A six-part 14 hours-of-video deep dive into Disnleyland queueing and ticketing systems or whatever.

No, stop, write it the fuck down. You definitely wrote a bunch down in service of making this fucking video so why not also just release that for fucks sake? Are people so unable to get involved in reading anymore?

Some things are more helpful as a YouTube video, like How-To videos where you can see more clearly what is happening when a written instruction can be unclear. It's also useful for speaking truth to power by recording cops who are breaking the law and so forth. But those are specific use cases.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Are people so unable to get involved in reading anymore?

I don't know know if this trait carrys over to Lemmy, but on reddit I would get my best upvotes on messages that were 1-2 sentences, usually with a quote or reference to something popular.

You know, thoughtless content where I'm just reminding them of a quote from the office, or a small joke. Anything more than a paragraph and people replied "Whoa! I'm not reading that mountain of text! Meanwhile it's less text than would be on a pamphlet.

It reminds of something Bo Burnham said in a song from Youtube Live, which was planned as an annual celebration of youtubes biggest stars featuring live performances on stage. Bo Burnham had just broke out. He said:

"It's youtube, it's what this country's been needing, an entire generation of kids who don't waste their time reading!"

That was 2009. Which means at the youngest, those kids are now at least young adults. And the older ones are pushing 30 now.

Excuse me as I go cry looking in the mirror at my grey hairs, pondering how many more years until I need a cane.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Thankfully, the trait for the most part does not carry over. I still see (and get) a lot of upvotes on dumb, cheeky posts.

But honestly, the deep dives and thoughtful shit gets way way way more love, in my experience.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people are bad at reading. Sometimes it's not their fault. Taught poorly, learning disabilities, whatever. Sometimes they're just lazy and out of practice.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

To be clear, I'm not against people who have trouble reading having a resource, like I said, it would be ideal to produce a video and a text/image document. This way you can reach the most people and not put off the people who would just like to be able to read it quietly.

I just dislike when the only source is a YouTube video.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I think we agree. I get very frustrated when there's only video. I'll be like "Is power A or B better in game X?" and find a bunch of 10 minute videos that could be summed up in a paragraph that said like "A has higher burst DPS by a wide margin, but B does more damage overall in fights that last more than a few rounds"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I think this problem is mostly solved if people were more willing to take their obviously highly produced and edited scripts and just make those publicly accessible with sources and whatnot, which they presumably need to basically do anyways in order to have good captioning on their video. The main problem isn't so much that they use videos, to me, but that we have no way to sort through leagues of text documents and blogs now. Harder for me to subscribe to and read a blog in a dedicated fashion, I guess. I dunno, I guess ultimately I'm just saying that the two mediums need more connection, which would be mutually beneficial, I think.