this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
120 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37521 readers
193 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even though there are already a couple of other threads about this Schweinerei, there wasn't a good place to insert this into the discussion, and for those unfamiliar, this video's a good starting point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

As far as InDesign alternatives go, do people know about VivaDesigner or even LaTeX for that matter?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Once upon a time print shops would only accept files in Quark Xpress format. Eventually, they came to accept InDesign documents too. They have licenses for the software and workflows and toolchains set up to integrate those files into their existing prepress and press systems.

LaTeX is purely for academic markup for postscript printing. VivaDesigner and its kind? Only niche and hobby layout and print.

That said, I only share in PDF now, so I use other software for the layout phases and don’t care that it isn’t portable to other shops.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know about VivaDesigner (never looked for an alternative anyway), but I hope people know about Scribus. LaTeX is a bit too manual for someone coming from InDesign, so it's not a real alternative in that sense. My point was, that people have projects and files created and maintained with the Adobe software. Unless the programs are 100% compatible with the alternative, it's hard for many to make the switch. Plus they would need to learn a new "complex" tool, and know exactly which one is the right one and is worth switching for years to come.

Just giving people an alternative is not enough to convince them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've tried to use scribus, but the interface is pretty clunky and it doesnt react well to high-dpi screens in my experience.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

If you start from the assumption you're using Quark 3.3, it's not bad,

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Or maybe Affinity Designer? I bought that a few years ago for Mac and it was really good.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

In a word, no. They are focused on the Adobe name. A bit like Apple, lots of good alternatives but who wants to be seen with a 'insert non fashionable name here' phone. There was a time when Adobe was king, not anymore though.