this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
373 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
57455 readers
3990 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Now might be a good time to start getting familiar with Krita and/or GIMP. They will have different workflows and might not fit well in every situation, but reducing reliance on user-hostile corporate terms and closed, poorly-defined file formats is likely to be worthwhile in the long run.
I only use Gimp for my image editing and I can literally do everything I ever attempt. I do stuff game modding and 3d model textures sometimes. Wtf else do people want in gimp, an automatic dick sucking machine?
Yes.
Using GIMP, getting sucked off while wearing a GIMP suit.
Doesn't gimp have a bunch of hard-coded sRGB shit, which makes it absolutely worthless piece of garbage for any even half-serious work?
Yep, which should change when they release 3.0.
Oh cool!
"Wtf else do people want in gimp, an automatic dick sucking machine?"
I mean, now that you mention it, I would very much yes. YES.
I use Gimp for all my Cyanotype negative making in my photography hobby. It hasn't asked me even once to see if it likes what I'm doing. It just does the thing I want it to do and waits for more.
I use Photoshop 5.5. Most of the features added since then are useless to me.
Yeah, say that to professionals whose workflow rely on the thight integration and features of Adobe's software. I'm sure migration to a piece of crap software with a S&M name that can't even do CMYK will work great.
Affinity is a good alternative still, at least until Canvas implement the subscription model (which I still believe they will do).
It can do color separation. I do that for cyanotype and carbon negatives. It's a little round about that someone programmed for it. That's the benefit of opensource. If you know how, you can make it quak like a duck and look like a cow. If you want it to bark but don't know how, just search to see if someone has done it or if someone will help you do it.
As a side commentary, a friend of mine owns a Cessna and flies around it. He also flies around it. And he can fly the Cessna too. Anyway, if you ever took a look at the dashboard of a 737, it looks nothing like the Cessna. But both fly pretty good. So if you wanna fly all the time without the captain telling you what peanut to chew when, then get your little Gimp plane and fly. Otherwise, you wanna do the same as the rest of the sheeple, just find your seat and ask the attendant to do the art for you while you watch how its done out the side window. I'm sure you can get paid the big bucks for that. Being sarcastic ofcourse, plus how can you concentrate with the darn open hole where the safety door used to be.
the man is being downvoted but is right. at least suggest affinity or krita.
anyone who ever did image editing professionally knows how bad gimp's workflow is.
No, they are being snidely combative, both in tone and by disingenuously suggesting that their cherry-picked class of users somehow invalidates the fact that these other tools work very well for many people.
That is not being right. That is being a self-absorbed jerk.
I did.
Yes, I am being a jerk because GIMP gets routinely thrown around as a Photoshop alternative,which is not. You say I cherry picked a user base, but who are the people that actually pays to use Adobe Cloud? I assure you that they are mostly professionals, because the subscription is expensive.
Now, the "many people" don't need Photoshop. In fact, there's no reason they should even install it. But people say "Photoshop" and hear "GIMP" as alternative, and this should stop because the app is objectively bad. There's Krita, there's Photopea, there's Darkroom, there's myPaint, there's even Inkscape. Anything is light years ahead that thing, yet it's recommended again and again like a sad joke made to inflict pain on its users.
GIMP is not a good tool. Stop using, stop recommending it.
It all depends on what you use it for. There are many valid criticisms of GIMP but the name is such a silly one. It stands for GNU Image Manipulation Program.
If you're a professional, then you use Photoshop. But for the vast majority of people GIMP is perfectly adequate. I've done so much on there over the last 2 decades. I've done construction drawings, forged documents, removed people from pictures, used it to make it seem like pictures of receipts were scanned, etc