this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13394 readers
959 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
showing up in dirty overalls for my one (1) free beer and then going to the better bar across town to actually spend my money
This is what I and every person I willingly drink with would do.
"Thanks fuck you, see you tomorrow. Can't wait for you to have to explain what about my attire isn't straight so you're not running up against false advertising claims by not giving us a free beer everyday."
Also this really seems like about the easiest slam dunk ever for discrimination against a protected class but I assume lgbtq people aren't a protected class in whatever windswept sithole this is in.
I think federally at least sexuality is a protected characteristic, but I don't think the courts in Idaho would respect that so you'd need to have the funds to appeal it up a few levels
Btw the ruling to make sexuality a protected characteristic was an incredibly rare Gorsuch W where he ruled that discriminating based off of sexual orientation was discriminating based off of sex (i.e. if you refuse service to Jim because Jim dates Bob, but you wouldn't refuse service to Jane because Jane dates Bob, then that's implicitly discrimination based off of sex)