this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1909 points (89.9% liked)

Political Memes

5511 readers
731 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1909
Just a reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is exactly the lie this post was created to criticize

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Donald, an insurrectionist: "I should be allowed to murder political opponents."

SCOTUS: "Oh, maybe he's right, let's consider."

You: "Everything is fine, just another regular election."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Everything is decidedly not fine. Where was that in my comment? I merely pointed out that your rhetoric is the same as we hear every election.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A president who claims he can murder whomever, whenever is novel, horrifying, and would be the end of voting. Who is going to stop him if SCOTUS rules that way and how? Especially with half the legislative branch complicit. And in fact this same person has already committed an insurrection. You want to play it off, "oh, you guys are panicking every four years."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Once again, you're saying I'm saying things that I'm not.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, those are the things you are saying right now.

You're free to go in depth and clarify what your intent is saying, "we hear this every election," when people are discussing an openly authoritarian candidate who publicly wants to murder political opponents and has already done an insurrection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

My intent was to push back on your unfounded retort to someone saying they wish there would be one election where the Democrats didn't try to guilt people into voting for them based on fearmongering. You responded to them with... fearmongering. I responded to you to point out that your fearmongering is the same tactic used in every election ever. I didn't make any claims about the validity of Trump's threat to the US.

You then kept putting different words and claims into my mouth to argue against. So I kept saying "no, I'm just saying that this fearmongering is the same as has been used in every election."