Anti-Corporate Movement
This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.
Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.
Current topics this includes but is not limited to:
- Meta's entry into the fediverse
- Game companies putting gambling mechanics in childrens games
- Embracer groups buyout and closing of smaller game studios
- IP trolls destroying small companies and keeping progress back for profit
Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.
Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.
But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.
But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.
But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.
But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.
view the rest of the comments
That's not what 'extend' in EEE means. That would be if they started unilateraly extending the activitypub protocol itself.
I can see your point. I might have to change my headline.
The „unique“ extensions do have a certain ring to it though. Imagine, you make a mastodon fork with your trillion dollar marketing machine and motivate people to make plugins and extensions for it - not mastodon or the ap protocol. Isnt this just an extension of the extension then?
If people want to use this plugin, they have to use threads…
The full quote adds some important context to what they meant by "unique".
These "unique integrations" aren't features or plugins exclusive to Threads in comparison to the larger fediverse, they're the types of features that would be unique to the applications developers who use the API will create, but aren't available in the default Threads app. For example, one app's "unique" feature might be collating data on interactions with your posts (like to track brand growth), while another's might be built for scheduled or automated posting (like a streamer who sends out automatic Tweets when they go live on Twitch).
These sorts of things are all available currently through Mastodon's API, Threads is playing catch-up here.
Ok thanks for adding context