this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8150 readers
289 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I recommend everyone read Techno-Feudalism by Yanis Varoufakis for a really solid Marxist analysis of the Internet. He described much better than I could how the Internet went from a free and open commons to a tool of oppression, and speculates how the Internet may one day become a tool for liberation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I like his math, but don't like his thesis about it being a regression to feudalism.

Not much about the employer-employee relationship is changing, and big tech engaging in rent-seeking on other businesses doesn't change the primary relationship people have with labor.

If most people performed their labor via a system akin to Uber or Doordash, then I'd be more inclined to agree.

The phenomena seems closer to finance capital supplanting industrial capital as the hegemonic form of power. Technology and information systems may have begun supplanting finance capital as the next stage of evolution of that process.

Otherwise, I think his analysis is solid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree, I haven't read the book but it seems like a vulgar conception and strikes me as a bit lib because he's basically refusing to say the problem is capitalism and saying it's a secret new thing instead which is just a distraction

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

My thoughts on it too. But thats probably why he still gets booked for interviews and shit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If most people performed their labor via a system akin to Uber or Doordash, then I'd be more inclined to agree.

IIRC he started this line of inquiry ~5 years ago when "Gigification of the Economy" was a point of discourse going around and I think in that context it would have been reasonable to go there, but otherwise I agree there's hairs to be split about the specific social relations and relations to production that make it hard to view it as regression as you noted.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Same as any other means of production. Mass media is what started the really revolutions of the proletarian era, the Internet is still young.