40
Nearly 30,000 people in northern California evacuated as raging wildfire spreads
(www.theguardian.com)
We moved here from lemmy.ml/c/collapse
This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.
Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.
RULES
1 - Remember the human
2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source
3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.
4 - No low effort, high volume and low relevance posts.
Related lemmys:
Have we tried beavers yet?
They clear out dead trees and cut them down before they can burn.
Then soak that shit in water by building a dam, which causes water to retain in the ground that also helps prevent fires from spreading.
Even if it doesn't work (it should work) we deployed the beavers by parachute last time. And that's be pretty cool to see.
What water are they going to use? NorCal is dry as a bone in the summer, and we won't see rain or snow until late October (if we're lucky).
Apparently this place, where they released them less than a year ago for the first time in 75 years
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/california-beavers-released-in-wild-18569060.php
No, I'm not saying that the beaver reintroduction isn't going well; I live in an area in the NorCal mountains where I have 3 beaver dams within a mile of my house.
I'm just saying that beavers aren't really a good way to mitigate wildfire danger because they only help in areas that have year-round water flow, which is a tiny portion of the Northern California forests. As close as I am to beavers, I still can't get wildfire coverage in my neighborhood, because the beavers only make an impact within about 15 yards of the river, and there just aren't that many year-round rivers in NorCal (at least relative to the amount of forest land)
Technically, they help where there isn't year round flow by daming it and keeping it there longer...
Like, this is a real thing with real studies.
Surface level might only look like a small area, but that water seeps into the ground for much further.
Which helps vegation, and that causes more water to be retained, being back new creeks and rivers that more beavers than dam.
Like bro, the first beavers in 75 years were released last year in NorCal...
Give em a minute
I think you misunderstood the headline. Beavers are not extinct in CA other than the one place in your article. I'm well aware of the impact of beavers on reintroducing and rehabilitating wetlands. I live on one of the rivers where beavers were reintroduced in the 1940's. I literally work with ecologists and hydrologists that work on some of these projects.
But guess what? That same river basin that has had beavers damming it for more than 75 years and has had a ton of work from the forestry service, CCC, and beavers had a massive wildfire two years ago. Reintroducing beavers is not enough to stop wildfires in California. There's literally not enough water and streams compared to the area of forest.
edit: but cool, just downvote and move on when shown to be wrong. Leave this to the people that have some knowledge of the issue
No offense and style points for the funny, but this is a "rake the forests" level comment.