this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
744 points (94.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21440 readers
876 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    744
    Flatpak haters seem to believe that if an app isn't on their distro's repos, it's the developers' fault. (lemmy.world)
    submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
    200 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Flatpak is nice but I really would like to see a way to run flatpakked application transparently e.g. don't have to

        flatpak run org.gnome.Lollypop

    and can just run the app via

        Lollypop
    [–] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    You could make aliases for each program, but I agree, there should be a way to set it up so they resolve automatically.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    You could possibly also make a shell script that does this automatically. I believe most flatpak ids follow a pattern such as com.github.user.package, for github projects for example. So you could loop through all installed flatpaks, extract the name, and then add the alias.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

    Agreed, but I also feel like such a thing should be included with Flatpak by default instead of leaving it to the users to solve.

    [–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

    You can symlink /var/lib/flatpak/exports/bin/org.gnome.Lollypop (if you are using a system installation) or ~/.local/share/flatpak/exports/bin/org.gnome.Lollypop (if you are using a uset installation) to ~/.local/bin/lollypop and run it as lollypop.

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

    Well, Flatpak installs aliases, so as long as your distribution - or yourself - add the <installation>/exports/bin path to $PATH, then you'll be able to use the application IDs to launch them.

    And if you want to have the Flatpak available under a different name than its ID, you can always symlink the exported bin to whatever name you'd personally prefer.
    I've got Blender set up that way myself, with the org.blender.Blender bin symlinked to /usr/local/bin/blender, so that some older applications that expect to be able to simply interop with it are able to.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    Is there some way to set an install hook that automatically makes those symlinks when you install a flatpak?

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Well, Flatpak always builds the aliases, so as long as the <installation>/exports/bin folder is in $PATH there's no need to symlink.

    If you're talking specifically about having symlinks with some arbitrary name that you prefer, then that's something you'll have to do yourself, the Flatpak applications only provide their canonical name after all.
    You could probably do something like that with inotify and a simple script though, just point it at the exports/bin folders for the installations that you care about, and set up your own mapping between canonical names and whatever names you prefer.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

    put flatpak in your PATH and you can youse the app name like normal

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    I just run them raw, like just

    org.gnome.Lollypop

    Not ideal, but it's what I do

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    It's fecking raw!

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    [Honk Honk]

    Sewer Count: 999

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Nice fucking model! #FreeCivvie11