this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
1177 points (99.1% liked)

linuxmemes

20454 readers
565 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
1177
Title (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

~~51 years~~ 8 seconds

$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 2.277s (firmware) + 1.145s (loader) + 1.644s (kernel) + 3.211s (userspace) = 8.279s 
graphical.target reached after 3.211s in userspace.

$ lscpu | awk -F '  +' '/^ *M.* n/ {print $1, $2}'
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3517U CPU @ 1.90GHz

$ vmstat -s | awk -F '^ +' '/[0-9]* K t.* m/ {print $2}'
3901984 K total memory
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

2s in firmware??? I'm used to at least 30s

[–] possiblylinux127 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What ram do you have?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

32G DDR4-3200

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if more memory still increases post time even on modern computers that don't do a full test on every boot. I feel like I've noticed faster post on computers with less ram compared to ones with more but I haven't gotten around to actually testing changing the amount on the same computer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think my BIOS has a setting to skip that part

[–] possiblylinux127 1 points 1 month ago

Very odd