World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
https://www.bbc.com/news/60571253
The only way they could enable Russia more is by directly sending them munitions.
It does seem rich for NATO to call China out on this when NATO members are sending Israel weapons and enabling a different genocide.
Maybe there's some reason that's different but I definitely don't understand it off the top of my head.
NATO members give Israel weapons to conduct a genocide therefore it's okay if China is complicit in Russia's invasion of Ukraine where they are conducting a genocide.
I see. Genocide is fine as long as two genocides cancel each other out.
I can't work out your tone from this text. Are you suggesting I'm saying it's okay that either of these things happening?
I'd say that if NATO are willing to point out China funding Russia, they should also be capable of the self reflection to admit their own faults too.
I get that this wouldn't work politically though. It's just really frustrating to see such an obvious scream at a mirror.
Sorry, I'm just so used to the frequent whataboutism. I understand what you're saying now.
No worries. I can see how it'd be interpreted like that. Especially given the amount of what aboutism we see in the comments.
I also struggle with Lemmy comments as I'm usually writing here tired in my 'downtime' between other responsibilities. You guys get the worst of me! Haha
Which of these genocides did you hear about on TikTok, which has it's algorithms dictated by the Chinese government?
I haven't been a teenager since the 1990s, so I've never used TikTok. I think you can figure out the answer to your question from there.
You're not a teenager and you still think spewing nonsense emotions at strangers accomplishes something?
Jesus.
I'm not sure what "nonsense emotions" are, but it's kind of weird that you ask me about hearing about genocides on TikTok and I tell you I've never used TikTok, you act like you never said that and just move on to something else.
Let's go back to you asking me which of the genocides I heard about on TikTok. Was your question answered in a satisfactory manner with my explanation that I've never used TikTok? If so, the proper reaction would be to say thank you.
Ukraine literally praises the Chinese dual-use items that they received (drones, etc.) and calls them far superior to Western equivalents.
The problem is that if China were to pull out of trading with parties of the conflict, it would also deny Ukraine from much-needed dual-use equipment.
Meanwhile, Russia? They've spent decades figuring out how to skirt sanctions and their allies in Central Asia are more than happy to profit off of such dealings.
Please show them praising the ones the received directly from China rather than bought through a third party.
Maybe China should stop sitting on the fence and support Ukraine outright?
They also trade on the same terms with literally everyone else. That’s called being neutral.
Please show me these terms on selling dual-use items to Ukraine.
They’re literally one of Ukraine’s largest trading partners if not the largest. Has even all lead to goofy shit where you’ll see stuff like having both Ukrainian and Russian reviews on (previously?) uncontrolled equipment like night vision goggles on Chinese sites. Otherwise their general policy response to all this has been to tamp down on equipment exports like that for everyone, everywhere.
Oh, well, if there are reviews they must be doing it. No one can possibly fake a review.
Just look up anything drone related on aliexpress and 90% of the reviews will most likely be Ukranian and Russian.
(I think you might only be able to see the nationality in the app)
While some of those might be fake, I think most of them are real.
As long as you think most of the reviews for drones on AliExpress real, China is definitely selling the same dual use items of all kinds to Ukraine as it is to Russia, and I'm sure at the same price too.
Logic.
If you tell me a reason why some AliExpress seller should create fake reviews which appear to come from ukraine or russia specifically, let me know.
You can never be 100% certain of anything.
For me all the signs point to china selling to whoever is buying stuff from them, especially since its not the government or even large conglomerates, but factories and companies of all sizes and shapes that sell drones and other dual use items.
As long as there isnt any blanket ban from the government they sell to everyone, because why would you make less profit if you could make more?
I dont know if there are big price differences when buying wholesale depending on which country you buy from, but there definetly arent any when buying single items.
I also think that china isnt supplying russia because it wants russia to win, but because it wants russia to be dependent on them.
You seem to be deliberately conflating what a Chinese company is doing and what the government of China is doing.
I mean, if you explicitly want dual use stuff which is always a weird category: https://www.businessinsider.com/us-drones-glitching-getting-lost-in-ukraine-picking-chinese-ones-2024-4
Also can’t really see China turning off the taps on these exports considering they’re a world leader in it and it’s a pretty key tech.
That's talking about DJI drones.
You can buy them on Amazon.
That is not the same as China selling directly to Russia and I think you know that.
Also, I explicitly want dual use stuff because that's explicitly how they are being accused of aiding Russia.
What do you think dual use means?
Go back and re-read the first comment you replied to and then ask yourself if asking me that question now makes any sense.
And, again, Ukraine buying DJI drones on the public market is not the same as China directly selling Russia parts to make or repair weapons, which, again, I think you know.
It’s quite easy for people who know what they’re doing to repurpose processors and components in consumer devices? And, you can also buy almost whatever cpu/component you want on Amazon too if you know what you’re looking for?
Otherwise, as I mentioned I don’t like it as a category because it leads to this silliness. At one point Israel was blocking all concrete imports to Gaza under dual use reasoning, and although I don’t like them one bit they kind of had a point. But, you also kinda need it if you want to build modern structures.
I’d assume NATO’s largely talking about machining equipment, electronics, and drones though. But, I don’t think they actually clarified anything? And while Ukraine itself probably doesn’t have much military use for the first two as any military plant would probably get hit, with how prominently drones have featured in this war they definitely fall under dual use.
And, again, they are not buying those drones directly from China.
If North Korea sells me a missile and I sell it to you, you are not buying arms from North Korea and North Korea is not selling arms to you.
I’m pretty sure they are literally buying tons of them from China. What are you even on. There aren’t any restrictions there because that’s part of their neutrality. Otherwise I’m done cause this is absurd.
As long as you're "pretty sure" they are, it must be true. There is no higher evidentiary standard.
What exactly do you think exports are? A DJI drone is manufactured in China. If it's bought through Amazon or Alibaba and shipped to Ukraine, that's classified as an export. The public market is how imports and exports happen.
I see. You're just going to pretend that China selling to a third party and that third party then selling to Ukraine is the same thing as China selling directly to Russia.
That's not a good thing.