this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
133 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8133 readers
246 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you're in a house that's on fire, and all the exits are locked, yes, it will get worse... But do you expect people to be excited when you say team blue is fighting hard to make sure you will be have access to buy a fire extinguisher with a 50% tax credit 2 years from now?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think the point is more that the house is not yet on fire. Currently for most Americans it's more like the house has a leaky roof and it smells of dead rats in the walls. We're nowhere near the house on fire yet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

For white people

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No but I probably still would not support any movement aiming to hasten collapse, because people with the indifference to bring about what that entails could not be trusted to lead in any humanistic way

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

Who’s trying to make the collapse come faster? It’s not like accelerationism is a strategy or something, it’s just a reasonable accurate view that helps one cope.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What movement are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If there was such a movement trying to destroy America from within it would be incredibly based. Unfortunately for us, no such thing exists and instead it’s all chauvinist squishy libs doing nothing and acting like they know the path forward when they are clueless

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

chauvinist squishy libs doing nothing and acting like they know the path forward when they are clueless

I'm clueless too, but maybe I am a lib.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

If only there was an immortal science of some kind

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

obviously the anarcho-marxist-bidenist clique, aunt tifa

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Do you know what the words “revolutionary defeatism” means and do you believe it is your duty as a socialist?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah, are you suggesting as socialists we should do whatever we can to help the status quo because things could get worse? Should we vote Biden and try to prevent capitalism’s crises? We already do espouse what could be done reformistically for propaganda purposes. The crisis is terminal, I don’t know what you want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Do you know what the words “revolutionary defeatism”

I don't think the context here is the same as when Lenin coined that term. He was largely advocating for defeatism in Russia because he thought weakening the Czar would enable a communist revolution within the country, which it did. That's not going to happen in the US, if anything our empire weakening will just make people here more reactionary.

You can, and clearly do, and I agree, support socialists within the Imperial Core trying to hasten the Empire's collapse any way we can (which isn't much honestly) as anti-imperialist praxis, but I don't thing the term "revolutionary defeatism" is really applicable to this strategy since it's not going to lead to a revolution, not here anyway.