this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
50 points (80.5% liked)
Not The Onion
11842 readers
188 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're right. I should clarify that pretty much every vegan I've met that says they're vegan has been preachy. But that's kinda besides the point. You can absolutely say you're a vegan but not be preachy. I'm interested in hearing what vegans have to say so long as they don't:
act higher and mightier than anyone else because of their beliefs.
use language that suggests people who eat meat are murderers.
suggest that everyone quitting meat would slow down climate change, because although it would be nice, it's not at all realistic.
And so on...
But as I've said, every vegan I've come across that openly claims to be a vegan has spouted one of these points, and comes across as preachy and judgemental, even if they have good intentions.
"I'm fine with discussing veganism as long as the vegans stop making objectively true but uncomfortable points."
The first point is obviously subjective (and your interpretation) but the other two are facts. Animals need to die for you to be able to eat them and somebody intentionally killed them in order to sell them to you for consumption. Calling this murder is a bit polemic but not factually wrong as it's an intentional and pre-mediated killing - the thing we call "murder". And yeah, if everyone stopped eating meat, climate change would slow down because fewer resources would be spent on breeding and raising cattle. It's a scientifically proven fact and also kind of a no-brainer. You don't think people will stop eating meat but that doesn't make the point any less factual.
I do eat meat, by the way. I just don't deny uncomfortable facts and don't get angry at people stating them. This is exactly what I meant when I said your guilt is your own. You know these facts are true but you don't want to confront that. This makes you uncomfortable to the point that you lash out at vegans who you perceive as guilt-tripping while they're just stating facts.
Just because a point is factual does not make it worth discussing or mentioning in an interesting convo. If everyone stopped driving a 1-2 ton personal metal brick on wheels and started biking climate change would also be slowed, or if half the population died right now it would also be slowed, or if the sun exploded. Who cares? These are not realistic solutions to that problem so what is the reason you would bring it up when discussing diets? Is the reason to inform? It just seems to me like someone mentioning "murder" and "if no one ate meat" while discussing diets is not looking for useful conversation.
You mention the difference is in believing it to be possible. I believe that meat harvested from slaughtered animals will someday be a rarity, but not soon enough to be (part of) a real solution for climate change. Lab meat is just now hitting consumer stores, and climate crisis is on our doorstep.
Sorry mate, vegans can't change the reality of what it means to eat a dead animal. I'm sorry it hurts your feelings that you're a carnist, maybe if you want to stop being guilt tripped by reality you could stop being a carnist