Politics

10187 readers

272 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

104

Michigan Attorney General worries Trump won’t accept loss to Harris: If Trump had trouble conceding to an older White man, he ‘is definitely not going to be OK’ losing to a younger Black woman (19thnews.org)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archived version

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel worries that former President Donald Trump may not accept the results of the upcoming general election if he loses — in part because of whom he might lose to.

“My belief is this: If Donald Trump had such a difficult time conceding that he lost to another older White man, he is definitely not going to be OK in the event that he loses a presidential election to a younger Black woman,” Nessel told reporters Monday, referencing Vice President Kamala Harris’ expected place at the top of the Democratic ticket. “And I am very concerned about what plans he and his allies might have to be disruptive to the 2024 election.”

[...]

“He’s already said if he doesn’t win, it’s because it was stolen. And I mean, that is so frightening — ‘Either I win, or it’s not fair,’” she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Against the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and Intelligence/surveilance of the world's #1 superpower?

How do the losers organize and strategize against that?

The 'war' would last a few hours.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

And, as a prosecutor, she's likely vicious enough to use available assets.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You are thinking of the US military and intelligence community as far more monolithic than it is. Republicans will claim Harris is an illegitimate administration, and tons of federal employees might go along with it (nevermind that SCOTUS could very well side with Trump, giving them a "legitimate" legal claim to their bullshit).

Also, deploying troops inside the US would require an act of Congress to be legal, which makes the military strength far less relevant.

And this isn't even beginning to touch on the sheer impossibility of fighting an insurgency inside your own borders.