Since I was curious I checked the actual amount of upvotes and downvotes of my post on mbin. It got 56 upvotes and 66 downvotes according to them since I was curious. Seems I hurt their little ego when I mentioned blocking their instance.
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
9 points (56.7% liked)
MeanwhileOnGrad
1338 readers
50 users here now
"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"
Welcome to MoG!
Meanwhile On Grad
Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!
What is a Tankie?
Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.
(caution of biased source)
Basic Rules:
Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.
Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.
Apologia — (Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.
Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.
Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.
Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.
You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yup, that's me, sort of. I consider myself libertarian and hoped Lemmy would be a free speech bastion (within reason, I respect healthy moderation, but any topic should be fair game for those who are considerate and constructive). But Lemmy.ml really doesn't like constructive criticism of China or Russia, and that's just not okay with me.
So that's why I'm here. I'm fine abiding by the rules of this instance, and generally speaking I don't have issues expressing well-sourced arguments that may be a bit unpopular. I get a bunch of downvotes if that opinion is unpopular (even if well-supported by empirical evidence), but I haven't been banned for it. I did get banned from lemmy.ml/c/privacy for posting a well-sourced argument that Russia may not be the most privacy-friendly country in the world.
Just out of curiosity, do you consider your ban comment to be "constructive criticism?"
The comment I got banned for? Yes.
Since I was banned and my posts removed (not sure if manually removed or just disabled while the ban was in force), I don't know if I can go find the comment chain any more. If you know of a way to search for comment replies from another user, I'd be happy to go find it.
But basically the discussion was about GrapheneOS. The mod really didn't like the lead dev and recommended people avoid the software, and my position was that the software should be evaluated on its merits, not its association with any particular individual. I agreed that the lead dev was toxic (they're autistic and very vocal, which can lead to issues), but that fact is irrelevant to whether someone should use a particular piece of software. They threatened to ban me, and I said something like, "If you choose to, that's your prerogative, I obviously can't stop you," and then they mentioned something vaguely related to Russia (I think saying they're privacy friendly because of Snowdon? I honestly don't recall), and I replied that Russia doesn't have a particularly good track record for privacy, and that's when I got the ban. All of my communication was in pretty neutral language (like I'm doing here), and throughout the comment chain I linked to a lot of sources, so I obviously wasn't trying to hide anything (the mod mostly linked to screenshots of their own posts from Reddit about their "research").
I'm not going to mention their username here because I don't want anyone to go harass them, but they were one of the mods at /c/privacy and they post quite a bit there, while the other mods don't seem to. I reached out to one of the mods there over private DM about it, and here's that message (they never got back to me). I don't recall saying anything about Israel or Palestine, but maybe our conversation briefly touched on it.
And here it is in text if that's easier (redacted usernames):
I don't recall talking about Palestine, but I did imply that maybe this mod in particular is from Russia or supports Russia and thus doesn't see the privacy issues they have over there.
Anyway, feel free to look for that comment chain. I think I messaged the mod on the same day that it happened, so the 5 months ago time should be pretty accurate. Be warned, the comments were very long because we went back and forth over various disagreements, with me citing sources and them (IIRC) basically spouting FUD.