this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024

126 points (99.2% liked)

Canada

7185 readers

353 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

List of All Teams: unknown
Toronto Blue Jays

Basketball

List of All Teams: unknown
Toronto Raptors

Soccer

List of All Teams: unknown
General Community: /c/CanadaSoccer
Toronto FC

💻 Universities

UBC
UWaterloo
SFU
UoGuelph
OTU
McGill
U Western
UofT
UofA: unknown

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

126

EV prices need to drop by one third if Canada wants to hit sales targets, says gov't report (www.ctvnews.ca)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Unless policies or technologies change, the ownership cost of electric vehicles (EVs) needs to decrease by 31 per cent if Canada to wants to reach its sales target of 60 per cent EVs by 2030, according to a new report released Thursday by Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux.

Last December, the federal government unveiled its Electric Vehicle Availability Standard that outlined zero-emission vehicle sales targets for automakers. The standard requires all new light-duty sales in Canada to be electric or plug-in hybrid by 2035. There are also interim targets of at least 20 per cent of all sales being EVs by 2026 and 60 per cent by 2030.

Those federal government targets come as growth forecasts for auto companies have plateaued and concerns about charging infrastructure persist. The price of EVs has also pushed the cars out of reach for many consumers. According to the Canadian Black Book, the average cost of an EV was $73,000 in 2023.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So do American and every other companies.

[+] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is right. There are different categories of exploitation and corruption, and it's not an apples-to-apples comparison. "Well sure but there's exploitation everywhere" is the wrong lens to understand this through.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But like most companies manufacture their stuff in China... so it's always China, sometimes with extra steps.

And while it may be worse there, the literal billions EU/US car manufacturers received and pocketed instead of supporting their own business makes me want to support them even less.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There has been a massive move away from China. They are still a major force but the West and China are moving apart. The vehicle tariffs are just an example of that.

I would not be surprised to see Tesla factories in Mexico. Chinese manufacturing is increasingly domestic and regional.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

God forbid they actually pay people fair wage and manufacture at home.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

To your first point: Yes, and decreasing reliance on China would be exactly how we could start to counteract that. I think we're agreeing with each other there.

As far as EU/US manufacturers behaving badly... I don't know enough about that situation to really comment intelligibly, but yeah that also sounds bad.