this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
98 points (90.2% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
3065 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
98
Meta content court rules ‘from the river to the sea’ isn’t hate speech (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Meta’s company-funded oversight body ruled Wednesday that the social media giant shouldn’t automatically take down posts using the phrase “from the river to the sea,” a decades-old rallying cry for Palestinian nationalism that has reignited a national debate about the boundaries of acceptable speech.

Meta’s Oversight Board, an independent collection of academics, experts and lawyers who oversee thorny content decisions on the platform, said posts they examined using the phrase didn’t violate the company’s rules against hate speech, inciting violence or praising dangerous organizations.

“While [the phrase] can be understood by some as encouraging and legitimizing antisemitism and the violent elimination of Israel and its people, it is also often used as a political call for solidarity, equal rights and self-determination of the Palestinian people, and to end the war in Gaza,” the board said in its ruling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That phrase is often used by both sides of the conflict, maybe that's why it wasn't banned, can't offend zionists can we?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

In this single instance, this tiny success appears to be to the benefit of who that phrase is more associated with. Lets not look a gift horse in the mouth

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It's because it's a shade too dogwhistley.

It doesn't say HOW you clear out that land, maybe you ask them to leave politely, maybe you buy them flowers and take them out for a romantic weekend in Paris then cancel the return flight.

It's just too vague to clearly say "slowly strangle them economically while terrorizing them and bulldozing their land out from under them".

Hamas's death to Israel is less subtle in comparison, although it could be construed as a disapproval of the New Zealand All Blacks especially their outside back Israel Dagg. It could even be a contempt of modern existentialist dogma through the painful reminder that, "Death to 'is real!'