3
[news] Abandon Biden Becomes Abandon Harris, Focuses on Battleground States
(blackagendareport.com)
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
3 points (53.1% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7186 readers
744 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If they abandon Harris, Trump will, at best, round them up into detention camps and deport them.
You should be fighting against genocide, not advocating for lesser evil genocide.
We are advocating against Genocide. What do you think repeatedly calling for a cease fire is?
https://www.npr.org/2024/03/04/1234822836/kamala-harris-benny-gantz-gaza-cease-fire-israel-hamas
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/25/harris-netanyahu-israel-cease-fire-00171315
"Let’s get the deal done so we can get a cease-fire to end the war. Let’s bring the hostages home, and let’s provide much-needed relief to the Palestinian people."
That is NOT a "pro genocide" position.
For that, you have to look at Trump:
https://apnews.com/article/trump-biden-israel-pr-hugh-hewitt-21faee332d95fec99652c112fbdcd35d
“They’re losing the PR war. They’re losing it big. But they’ve got to finish what they started, and they’ve got to finish it fast, and we have to get on with life.”
Harris - We need a cease fire to save the Palestinian people.
Trump - They just aren't killing people fast enough.
One of these two people will be the next President. If enough people reject Harris, we get Trump.
It is being ignorable so long as you wield no leverage. If you believe in electoralism, your current leverage is your vote. If you telegraph your vote for Harris then you are not really opposing a genocide so much as declaring that you will be troubled while you bear witness to it. You announce your pain and those of the systematically murdered civilians along with your inflinching support to continue both.
They don't even have to call your bluff because you aren't threatening anything. What ceasefire talk was there at the "joyous" DNC that had an Israeli speaj and the candidate pledge unconditional support?
Have you noticed that the Biden administration has attempted to make "ceasefire" to mean a temporary pause and hostage exchange? The call for a ceasefire is already a weak line and easy to coopt and ignore, in part because it is a vague "pro-peace" rather than pro-justice line that does not require any actual engagement or action or call to learn on the part of its supporters. See how cheap it has been to keep your support? They've given you nothing.
Here is a new line: end weapons and funding to Israel, stop the genocide now. Seems pretty modest to me.
Yes this was part of the kayfabe I mentioned that included redefining the meaning of ceasefire. That was Harris meeting with the openly genocidal Gantz that will only ever want escalated destruction of Palestinians while introducing what would become a redefining and cooption of ceasefire.
Previous ceasefires with Isrsel have been predicated on arms embargoes. How do you square that with Harris' announcement of unconditional support?
If you continue reading you will discover that your politicians lie and mislead. This is Harris trying to keep your support while continuing Biden's policies. It is literally the same line as Biden's and their only policy proposal is the aforementioned temporary pause and exchange.
Israel just assassinated the person they were supposed to be negotiating an alleged ceasefire with. What have Biden, Harris, et al had to say about this blatant undermining of their supposed flagship peace plan?
Israel has just begun a similar campaign against the West Bank. They killed an American activist that had been organizing in the US against complicity with Israeli perpetrated genocide. What is the response to the exact opposite thing happening? The most powerful people in the party, with the highest office, and literal control over the military, is not throwing its weight around to get Israel to stop. It is doing the opposite: arms, aid, and using its military to go after Houthis - who act in solidarity with Gaza - instead. The facts speak for themselves.
This is why the Uncommitted Movement switched to an arms embarho demand. Because this weaseling appropriation convinced liberals desperate to have any excuse to vote for their gemocider.
Trump has no voter contingent that he could maybe lose if he didn't feign sympathy for Palestinians. He doesn't need to do the "Lucy holding a football" thing on this particular issue.
The current Biden-Harris administration is genociding Gaza via its complete support for the Israeli settler colonial project, including a systematic civilian bombing campaign against housing, hospitals, food distribution, schools, and shelters. It has cut off electricity and water. If you vote for this, if you advocate for voting for this, you are complicit in genocide.
I would be happy to explain how lesset-evil cheerleading voting is self-defeating illogic, but I would hope that having blood on your hands would be enough.
I agree that as long as Bibi is in charge we have no actual leverage to get things done because he doesn't give two shits what anyone in the US says or does, but that's not the same thing as saying Harris is "pro genocide", she's not.
Blaming Netanyahu is a copout that distracts from two salient facts:
The US hasn't actually done anything against Israel, let alone withheld from actively supporting its genocide. It makes no sense to sat, "oh well I guess we could never make things happen due to Netanyahu". Nothing has been tried! But it does place the focus for responsibility on a foreign leader over whom you have no expectation of influence, whereas every person in the US can fight against genocide supported by the Biden-Harris admin.
Israelis have, on average, incredibly dehumanizing attitudes towards Palestinians. Netanyahu isn't even that far right in Israel. They broke that rapist out of jail and are parading him around on TV. This is typical of ethnic supremacist settler colonisrs, it has happened several times over the last 200 years, we know the pattern. The protests against Netsnyahu, and his lower approval ratings, are tied to sentiments about not being harsh enough on Gaza and not retrieving the hostages, not the genocide of Palestinians, who they call terrorists. Who they believe should not be shown on television in a sympathetic light, that it should be censored. All of this is to say that the genocide in Gaza is very popular in Israel. What is unpopular are the impacts to the settlers. Economic problems, exodus from the north, and an inability to return the hostages.
The Biden-Harris administration is supporting a genocide. That genocide depends on the consent and military support of the most powerful country on the planet. Both Biden and Harris are providing thus unconditionsl support. They are sending the weapons. They are sending the money. They are building the little pier that was used to land and extract military personnel. They are fighting the ICJ on Israel's behalf. They are pressuring every country they can on Israel's behslf. They are trying to undermine the Houthis' blockade done in solidarity with Gaza. Faced with a domestic anti-genocide movement, they are refusing to pressure college campuses to not sic cops (et al) on protesters and feed into the bad faith rhetoric that to oppose Israel's genocide is to be antisemitic. When corronating their new candidate, part of this genocidal administration, they brought on an Israeli speaker, pledged unconditional material support to Israel, and shut out a potential Palestinian soeaker.
Harris is not just pro-genocide, she has assisted this one and has pledged to materially support its continuation.
Bibi and the Likud property are literally the problem. They take US support intended for the legit support of the Iron Dome and re-direct it into war crimes.
Please see: everything I just said that contradicts overemphasizing "the problem" just being Netanyahu being obstinate. I wrote out two main points with many specifics to support and explain my meaning.
And the US knowingly funds the genocide in Gaza. It isn't an oopsie. They have only increased funding since Oct 7.
They are not funding the genocide. They are funding the legitimate defense of Israel.
The Israeli leaders are mis-directing that funding into the genocide.
Oh they are most definitely funding the genocide. Here us one simple example: Boeing is the exclusive manufacturer of JDAMs, a system that retrofits bombs to make them missiles. The US provides direct funding to Israel for them to "buy" these systems. JDAMs are the most common bombs used in this genocide to target civilian infrastructure. Hospitals, schools, refugee csmos, bakeries, mosques, churches.
Plenty of other forms of funding and material support, this is just a particularly visceral example.
100% wrong, these are offensive weapons with only one purpose and they are provided with no strings attached. Funding and support has only increased and Israel has only escalated.
The purpose for which they are sold is "defend Israel", the purpose Bibi puts them to use as is "genocide", but that is not why we're selling them.
An example I use quite a bit is humanitarian aid, a lot of aid we send out gets stolen or re-directed by corrupt governments. That doesn't mean we're going to stop sending aid.
"Defense" has a long history of euphemistic use and this is no exception. JDAMs have no defensive use. They are bombs. They have been and are used to bomb essential civilisn infrastructure in Gaza. The US and Israel still call it "defense". It is just a rhetorical trick. Same as " Israel has a right to defend itself", which is a thought-terminating cliche that provides a smokescreen for highly aggressive military actions with little care for civilians, journalists, aid workers.
Everyone in power knows how this works and what it means. It isn't an accident or even particularly unwanted. Israel has been invading and destroying Gaza for nearly a year. Nobody thinks a bunch of JDAMs are for defending Israel or are a case of misuse. They are being used exactly as intended.
That is not what Harris is doing.
Saying Israel should be able to defend itself is not the same as allowing Israel to offensively commit genocide. Two different things.
Harris supports the former, not the latter. Bibi wants the latter, not the former.
If you believe Harris is advocating for a ceasefire you deserve Trump
Harris is repeatedly saying that and advocating for it, including when she met with Bibi, so what's your evidence to not believe it?
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/25/politics/harris-netanyahu-israel-hamas-ceasefire/index.html
“it is time for this war to end and end in a way where Israel is secure, all the hostages are released, the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can exercise their right to freedom, dignity and self-determination.”
The vice president said there has been “hopeful movement” in the talks and that she pushed the prime minister to bring the conflict to a close.
“As I just told Prime Minister Netanyahu, it is time to get this deal done,” she said. “So to everyone who has been calling for a ceasefire, and to everyone who yearns for peace, I see you and I hear you.”
And Putin says he wants Harris elected instead of Trump.
Putin is not an honest broker and is known for being a master manipulator.
And Harris words are reliable?
Pretty much, yes.
I agree, we shouldn't vote for the SPD, they're not really any different than the NSDAP, we should send a message by not voting in the election of 1932!
The SPD wasn't doing a genocide.
The left argument against SPD advocated for voting for the KPD, not skipping voting. Aside from stark political disagreement, the SPD had mobilized the Freikorps against the left, killing many of their compatriots, including party leadership. The SPD was rarely in the fight against the Nazis taking direct action (terrorizing cities), that was communists and anarchists. The SPD were the polite progressives but still far to the left of Democrats today. To the left of Sanders. But when push came to shove and Nazi brownshirts were given license to fight and arrest communists, the SPD was useless, having no idea how to oppose the right.
However, the parties more similar to Democrats were the center and nationalist parties (e.g., Papen and Hindenburg) that ended up collaborating with the right and, eventually, making Hitler chancellor rather than support the left. There is an echo of this in this very thread, and in your comment.
I highly recommend actually reading this history.
Pfft, they're all the same, no difference between them really, not like either is going to actually change anything, why bother to vote at all?
The "Left" at this time, specifically in Russia, was purging the shit out of everyone, and committing the Holodomor.
But the argument that both sides are the same is very clear: Hitler and Stalin were both very much aligned when it came to the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, including the protocol for splitting Eastern Europe.
Couldn't be that much daylight between them? Both a bunch of warmongers, Stalin even invaded Finland 3 months after the war started.
I haven't said anything like that. I have, however, said that you should oppose gemociders and not vote for them.
The SPD is German and the analogy was about voting in German politics enabling Hitler. What you've said is neither here nor there.
I thought the next paragraphs would return to the subject at hand, but they didn't. I would be happy to discuss Hitler and Stalin in a different thread. Feel free to start one. But it doesn't address anything here.