this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
579 points (98.8% liked)
People Twitter
4975 readers
1082 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying.
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not to dismiss how insane the current court is, but the US supreme court was also on enslaver's side before the civil war. They were famous for making the terrible dred scott ruling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford
It's the scary part... the last time the court pendulum swing this far we had a full blown CIVIL WAR.
Go read Lincoln's inaugural address.
The majority is about how he wasn't going to federally outlaw slavery.
So yeah. The SC was proslavery, but the North wasn't against it either until well into the war. Even then it wasn't about doing the right thing. Wealthy Europeans knew the north would win, but also knew Southern landowners would sell on the cheap during the war.
By federally outlawing slavery, it made the agricultural land in the South drop in value.
This allowed the war to end significantly earlier.