Main
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
view the rest of the comments
Like all political alignment tests the logic is always backwards. If I answered half these questions as asked it would probably tell me I'm a republican. The Pokemon mystery dungeon personality test is better than this.
What does that mean exactly? Big military? Social programs? I want the government to do everything I want it to do and whatever "size" that requires is how big I want the government to be. If you removed military spending the government would be pretty small.
Taking a random individual and educating them makes them better at policy decisions about the subject of their education, but individuals aren't selected at random, educated, and given positions of influence. They are as often as not chosen for their policy positions, then sold as a "smart choice" because of their education. Or in other words, an educated leftist is better than an uneducated one, but an educated centrist or chud is just a more smug centrist/chud. So if I say "Better" am I going to be railroaded into the establishment democrat category? If I say "Worse" or "Neither" am I going to be railroaded into the science-rejecting anti-intellectual antivax category?
It isn't about people being "offended". Being offended is the symptom of a disease. It's so patronizing to be told "stop being offended" when someone says something that amounts to "You are subhuman" or "Your very existence is wrong" or "You should be left to die". "Offended" yeah I wish I was "Just offended".
We certainly have advantages, but I don't think I benefit from them. If I say "Don't benefit" does that mean I deny institutional racism and am against reparations and DEI? If I say "Do benefit" does that mean I recognize institutional racism but think society is a zero sum game?