this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
445 points (97.0% liked)

News

23284 readers
3480 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She could argue it's self defence technically. As we all know what shitfuckery advertising like that leads to...

She's probably been delivering the mail for decades. Just not some bigoted advertising.

It's not my job to pull down Nazi sticker crap or clean it up, but I do.

Yes management should reject that delivery, but she also has a right not to put her family in harm's way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Jesus christ, no, she can't argue that it's self defense. What is the imminent risk of physical harm to the mail carrier here? Self defense only applies to cases of immediate physical harm, and that's just not this. At best there's an argument to be made for very, very indirect harms.

This is every bit as dumb as arguing that someone waving a Nazi flag means that you can self-defense them to death because they're going to hurt someone eventually.

It’s not my job to pull down Nazi sticker crap or clean it up, but I do.

Good, and you should. But that's you acting in your personal capacity, not as an agent of the gov't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So should a bigoted transphobe mail carrier be allowed to deny mail from a source depicting trans rights as a positive thing?

Does this work both ways?

Or is it only that the law should be broken because you disagree with it. You don’t get to cherry pick federal laws bud. That’s not how it works.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What? The flyers promote the discrimination and criminalisation of a minority group, versus your example which would be promoting minority rights.
Those aren't comparable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They’re 100% comparable when you understand how federal law works. Learn it- then come back here and we can discuss whether or not a mail carrier has the right to decide what mail you get.

Until then, I don’t think you can carry your side in this discussion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well I'm not too well versed on Canadian federal laws as I'm a bit further south. So I looked into discrimination laws in New Brunswick, Canada and found this Human Rights Act

Some parts that could be relevant;

The New Brunswick Human Rights Act is the provincial law that prohibits discrimination and harassment based on 16 protected grounds of discrimination.

The Act prohibits discrimination in the following five areas under the provincial jurisdiction: Employment (includes job ads and interviews, working conditions, and dismissals); Housing (e.g. rent and sale of property); Accommodations, services, and facilities (e.g. hotels, schools, restaurants, government services, libraries, stores, etc.); Publicity; and, Professional, business or trade associations (e.g. Nurses Association of New Brunswick, New Brunswick Teachers' Association, New Brunswick College of Physicians, etc.).

Publicity includes any publications, displays, notices, signs, symbols, emblems that show discrimination or an intention to discriminate against any person or class of persons

Not a lawyer or expert, but that seems to apply at least superficially. Maybe a bit of a stretch. But it helps that the fliers were full of factually wrong and hateful anti-trans myths. And freedom of speech has limits, even federally.

ETA: However, mail carriers are probably exclusively covered by federal law, and the federal Canadian Human Rights Act ~~only seems to specify discrimination and not harassment. I do think it's too much of a stretch to say this would be covered by any federal laws~~

Final edit: ok I read more. This is the closest thing I could find from the federal Human Rights Act

12 It is a discriminatory practice to publish or display before the public or to cause to be published or displayed before the public any notice, sign, symbol, emblem or other representation that (a) expresses or implies discrimination or an intention to discriminate, or (b) incites or is calculated to incite others to discriminate

If I am misinterpreting it, please let me know. I think it could be used as an argument tho

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now look up wether or not mail carriers get to decide what mail you get-

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I understand that. I'm reading way too many laws already lol

If the letter is determined to be unlawful, there's a provision that allows Canadian Post to not deliver the letter. It's a whole process that the mail carriers did not follow. Maybe if they had tried, and used the argument that it was unlawful discrimination or harassment to deliver the fliers, they would have had a leg to stand on. It seems that they didn't, they took matters into their own hands, and they were punished accordingly.

To be more clear, I'm not arguing against the punishment. Just the fliers and if they could be considered unlawful

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, if I order a product, and the carrier doesn’t like the product- they can deny me my mail? Hmmm…

I’m nearly certain that’s not how it works.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What do you mean "doesn't like"? The federal government "doesn't like" citizens sending bombs in the mail, and they would deny you that, yes. I'm not sure what the point of your reply was, it doesn't argue against anything I've said. Sounds like a straw man.

There's a difference between individual mail carriers and the organization USPS or Canadian Post. And there's a difference between dislike and illegal. I thought we already established that, is that something you disagree on??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love how you have to go to ridiculous comparisons to make a point. It shows you have none.

• A bomb and a flyer you don’t like- AREN’T the same thing.

Now try again with this newly learned fact.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, they are not the same thing. That's what a comparison is. If you think it's a bad comparison, feel free to explain why you think so