this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

badposting

416 readers
224 users here now

badposting is a comm where you post badly


This is not a [email protected] alternative. This is not a [email protected] alternative. This is a place for you to post your bad posts.

Ever had a really shitty bit idea? Joke you want to take way past the point of where it was funny? Want to feel like a stand-up comedy guy who's been bombing a set for the past 30 minutes straight and at this point is just saying shit to see if people react to it? Really bad pun? A homemade cringe concoction? A cognitohazard that you have birthed into this world and have an urge to spread like chain mail?


Rules:

  1. Do not post good posts.
    • Unauthorized goodposting is to be punished in the manner of commenting the phrase "GOOD post" followed by an emoji that has not yet been used in the thread
    • Use an emoticon/kaomoji/rule-three-abiding ASCII art if the rations run out
  2. This is not a comm where you direct people to other people's bad posts. This is a comm where you post badly.
  3. This rule intentionally left blank.
  4. If you're struck for rule 3, skill issue, not allowed to complain about it.

Code of Conduct applies just as much here as it does everywhere else. Technically, CoC violations are bad posts. On the other hand: L + ratio + get ~~better~~ worse material bozo

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

because it sucks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay thanks, I think I've got that all. Time to put it into practice.

Oh wait oh fuck

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

for everyone who's just joined us, this is what's happening in @[email protected]'s brain:

  • aaro tries to read post
  • they see it's a "comprehensive" guide on why not to read the post that they are reading
  • guide is 3 words, therefore guide is not comprehensive
  • argument of the post is baseless and there is no reason to not read the post
  • they won't not read the post therefore they should read the post
  • cycle repeats blob-no-thoughts
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for breaking it down honestly that really helps, let me give this another go

i-told-you-dog stairs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

then there's the question of whether or not the guide is comprehensive.

if this guide is comprehensive, then you shouldn't be reading the post that you are reading. but if it isn't, then you should read the post that you wouldn't read that you are reading.

and what do we define as "comprehensive"? is comprehension subjective? how subjective are the rules that define what is and isn't subjective?

is this post comprehensive by virtue of our interpretation of subjective theory, or is this post inherently incomprehensive by being a badpost that is distributed through the medium of c/badposting?