this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
172 points (97.3% liked)

News

23024 readers
3311 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I witnessed a security guard taking a loaf of bread from a homeless kid all the while preaching the word of Christ. Christians are nothing like their Christ.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Christ is nothing like Christ. Christ likely never existed and is a myth.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Historians generally agree that Jesus existed. But regardless, the Christ of Christianity exists as an ideal they're supposed to follow. They do not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is it whenever this brought up an appeal to authority is invoked to people who weren't there? Why not just use evidence to prove your position instead of telling me what some random priest in the 2nd century thought about zombie-skydaddy?

There is no evidence he existed and the narratives disagree with each other. Easily could have been a fraud by James and Peter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Tell that to the scholars of antiquity. I'm just reporting what the prevailing thought is by people who study such matters because it was falsely claimed that most of them believe that Jesus was a myth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Tell that to the scholars of antiquity.

Sure. Hey guys hate to be a buzzkill and I know you have a sweet gig inventing one crazy way after another to make this myth be true but there really isn't anything here. It is a superstructure with no substructure. Until someone digs up some old letter or something you got nothing.

because it was falsely claimed that most of them believe that Jesus was a myth.

I don't think anyone in this thread did that. I know what they believe, I just don't care. Again

  • There is no evidence Jesus was a historical person
  • A fraud by the leading apostles could easily fit the data that we have.
  • Humans lie.
  • The narratives disagree with each other to an extent that it sounds very much like liars trying to remember their stories
  • There are things missing in the narratives that should be there.

In a way I sorta get it. There are like these Sherlock Holmes appreciation groups that have spent all this effort trying to find the historical 221B baker street. It is fun to pretend that a fictional character exists in the real world.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What historians are you talking to?

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evidence_for_the_historical_existence_of_Jesus_Christ#Non-Biblical_evidence

Outside the bible there is very little or no evidence for the existence of a Jesus.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Virtually all scholars of antiquity agree that a historical human Jesus existed. Historian Michael Grant asserts that if conventional standards of historical textual criticism are applied to the New Testament, "we can no more reject Jesus' existence than we can reject the existence of a mass of pagan personages whose reality as historical figures is never questioned."

Virtually all scholars of antiquity dismiss theories of Jesus's non-existence or regard them as refuted. In modern scholarship, the Christ myth theory is a fringe theory and finds virtually no support from scholars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't really matter if a "historical human Jesus existed" because the Jesus that Christians worship, the Jesus of the Bible, is a fiction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It does matter. Because it is near impossible to find a Christian who is fine with the Jesus story being a complete myth. Some of them will admit that not all of the contradiction-filled stories are correct but doubting he existed at all? Paul, the real founder, was at least honest about this and said all of their faith would be in vain if the resurrection had not happened.

The evidence points to a con that got out of control.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Some dude who started a personality cult around himself that grew out of control once he died. Like the warlord paedophile Muhammed after him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Michael Grant doesn't know that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Saying that we know that there was some king in a certain place and time isn't a big claim. Most places had kings. Saying that if even a quarter of the claims of the Gospels were true is a massive claim. Also whataboutism is kinda boring. I really don't feel giving "historians" slack because they cut themselves slack.

In modern scholarship, the Christ myth theory is a fringe theory and finds virtually no support from scholars

Not going to have a job selling book and teaching the story of some old con. You sell books by advancing dozens of different contradictory models of the events all of them equally impossible to test.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Claiming that Jesus of Nazareth existed is not extraordinary at all though. It's hardly far-fetched to claim that he was real. Claiming that he was the son of God and could perform miracles however, is - as someone else pointed out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right so you are trying to make the claim so small it can be snuck in. Theists try this trick with God all the time.

Does making a claim small make it true or is that a rhetorical device to try to manipulate the argument? If I told you I was Obama and you called me out on it so I said well really I did met him once in a bar when he was in Congress, would my altered claim become true by virtue of being ordinary?

Do you have evidence he existed yes or no?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Jesus existence has nothing to do with the religion in and of itself. He can be reall without Christianity being true. You're getting so caught up in wanting to argue against the theists that you're focusing on something completely irrelevant just to chalk up a victory.

I have no evidence one way or another for our against his existence, the point is that it doesn't matter. Jesus' potential existence has nothing to do with the truthiness of religion unless you believe that his existence can only be a validation of the new testament - which would be akin to your Obama comparison and would be patently ridiculous.

I have no proof that billions of specific people existed, doesn't change that they did.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't dug into this what-so-ever, but how would it even be possible to identify whether a specific person with that name existed 2000 years ago? It's not like you could just Google the guys Facebook profile or social security number back in 200AD

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's the thing. Anyone who knows how history works, knows that it's extremely hard to prove someone existed that long ago.

Most things we have to prove if someone existed is if other people talk about them or mention them in their writings.

Other than the bible, no one really talked about a Jesus existing at that time. Which makes sense, since if a Jesus did exist he would be a nobody.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Matthew 25:41-46 English Standard Version

41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not clothe me, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.’ 44 Then they also will answer, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to you?’ 45 Then he will answer them, saying, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’ 46 And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely terrible