this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
139 points (100.0% liked)
memes
22779 readers
384 users here now
dank memes
Rules:
-
All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.
-
No unedited webcomics.
-
Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop
-
Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.
-
Follow the code of conduct.
-
Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.
-
Recent reposts might be removed.
-
No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Simple: there's no dissonance involved whatsoever.
Disbelieving a media narrative is a proactive action. You have to personally know more than the reporter to disbelieve what they write or say. If you don't, then you fall into a type of stupor wherein you believe everything they write except the things you personally know about. An engineer may know that a certain article about bridges is bullshit, but they'll switch to a politics link and believe everything as per print.
In such a scenario the conventional beliefs the world are self reinforcing. You either work your way towards a rabbit hole of disbelieving everything on media or you just don't. So there's no dissonance involved. You never make the mental effort for there to be one.