this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
754 points (81.2% liked)

Political Memes

5429 readers
1790 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Fair point. I’ve edited my initial comment to address abstainers.

As for my grasp on vocabulary:

gaslighting: to psychologically manipulate (someone) usually over time so that the victim experiences doubts about their own emotional or mental stability

Exhibited in your suggestion that conformation bias is clouding my ability to read.

strawman: an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.

Demonstrated by your argument redirecting the focus to those who are ineligible to vote.

Ready to try again? Although you may have a better chance of convincing someone less literate.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Exhibited in your suggestion that conformation bias is clouding my ability to read.

Sorry, that's not gaslighting. I was suggesting that your confirmation bias makes you cherrypick non-voters among all the people criticizing the Dems. It's simply absurd to claim that only abstainers criticize the Dems. I did not try to manipulate you.

Demonstrated by your argument redirecting the focus to those who are ineligible to vote.

You said that "those who didn't vote shouldn't be allowed to complain". I felt included, since I didn't -ote, but I'm not a US citizen. Refusing to steelman your point does not equal strawmanning.

Ready to try again? Although, you may have a better chance of convincing someone less literate.

I'm trembling, when thinking of your literacy. /s 🙄

Stop telling me how great your farts smell.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I see. So you believe it’s not manipulative to attempt to discredit another’s opinion by repeatedly distracting from their point using well-known bad arguments, all without supporting your own opinion?

It’s no wonder Trump won.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

“I’m not a US citizen”

This appears to apply to a LOT of people who’re making the tired “democrats suck for losing” comments. It kinda boggles my mind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Right? When I talked with my English, German, and Australian friends they all blamed the voters immediately. “What the fuck are they thinking?!?” was the response.

It’s not like the DNC manipulated or obfuscated Harris’s message the way they did Bernie’s in 2016.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

When did I say something like that?

Sincethe whole world is dependant on the american empire in some form or another, it's pretty wild to prohibit non-US citizens to have an opinion on the US election.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

When did I say something like that?

Right here.

You said that "those who didn't vote shouldn't be allowed to complain". I felt included, since I didn't -ote, but I'm not a US citizen. Refusing to steelman your point does not equal strawmanning.

You're commenting on the very specific set of social, cultural, organizational, and regional elements that have affected this election, and you have no direct knowlege, or comprehensive knowledge of any of it. Yet here you are feeling really strongly about it.

That's fine in that it's not illegal or anything - hey, let your freak flag fly, but - I just find it strange. As a stupid American, if I were to feel really strongly about LiverpoolFC's lineup or strategies, you'd expect I knew a lot about football but I don't - yet here I am telling them Diogo Jota's injury is going to plague them the rest of the season and they're complete idiots for not working to replace him right now when it could make a damned bit of difference. And I don't watch football.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You're commenting on the very specific set of social, cultural, organizational, and regional elements that have affected this election, and you have no direct knowlege, or comprehensive knowledge of any of it. Yet here you are feeling really strongly about it.

Where did I say anything of the notion "democrats suck for losing".

Also, I'd argue that no one has "comprehensive" knowledge of the elements that affected this election. At least not at this point in time. "Direct" knowledge is IMHO not that important to judge the situation.

I think you underestimate how much US politics is covered around the globe. Just look at this community and remember: there are a lot of non-US citizens on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Okay, but we’re talking about the mindset of Americans that didn't vote against trump. I’d argue whatever insight the international press offers is significantly more limited than the insight one gets from living a large percentage of one’s life here. As regards party politics, at least.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Now that's what I call a strawman!

Edit: ... wait, actually, it's not. Your "argument" doesn't even parse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Lol... ok, Mr./Mrs. "Telling me I'm cherry-picking information and succeptible to confirmation bias (like everyone else is) is literally gaslighting". /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yup. By your third comment criticizing my opinion without stating or supporting a counterargument of your own, I assumed you were trolling and began treating you accordingly.

Have a day.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You yourself admitted that you claimed bs and edited the comment after I criticized you, but yeah I didn't "support a counterargument." /s 🙄

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

13 of the 15 people that read my comment understood that by “didn’t vote” I meant “abstained.” I only edited to help you and the other person understand the point.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Moving the goal posts and appeal to majority.

I think I might actually have a chance at high school in the end, huh? /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Once the bar is lowered even further? Yeah sure, why not? Everyone will.