this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
123 points (98.4% liked)

Main

15770 readers
230 users here now

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


gun-unity State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

guaido Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

smoker-on-the-balcony Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

frothingfash Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

just-a-theory An Amainzing Organizing Story

feminism Main Source for Feminism for Babies

data-revolutionary Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


ussr-cry Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey everyone, I've removed bans for everyone that did not request one in the previous admin thread. (I think. If you got banned and I didn't restore your account yet, let me know and I'll fix it.) Don't worry! We're not gonna just ban people for no reason.

In case anyone hasn't seen it yet, Alaskaball confirmed that Sangria was their admin alt. They were messing around with their admin tools on their own account and figured it would be seen as a funny bit, but without being informed of the bit many of the mods and admins were just as shocked, confused, and appalled as you were. I've talked to the other admins and mods, and we're all gonna take it easy on bits for a bit. (Pun intended. This is the last one, I promise.)

If you're afraid that there's been an infiltration of transphobic, egomaniacal wrecker mods who hate the users, I want to assure you that's absolutely not the case. The overwhelming majority of mods and admins on this site are trans. Our admins are all trusted, long-time users in good standing. We regularly browse, comment, and post on our main accounts. You post and chat with us daily as comrades, and we value all of you. You may not recognize the usernames on our admin accounts because we regularly swap the alts used for admin privileges. This is why you'll see really old or unused alt accounts as well as really new accounts on the admin team.

I've seen a lot of speculation down below, some entertaining, some upsetting. We absolutely do not accept transphobia or any form of bigotry on this site. Some of the statements provided by mods and admins have been seen as transphobic and bioessentialist. I want to offer some transparency, but also clarify that I can't get much more specific on this for personal security reasons.

During the earlier discussions on how we felt things could be improved with these communities, multiple trans mods and admins described their reasoning in favour of the change by expressing with a variety of wording that it's the [he/him] demographic in particular that has been the source of toxic and troubling behavior in the tanks. That the he/hims haven't been beating the accusations, so to speak. With that group being largely cishet white guys on this site, these two terms were assumed to roughly correlate. We weren't making prepared statements for release, the comments that got posted here were paraphrased and combined from more casual comments made by trans people, in the mod chat to mostly other trans people about some of the chauvinistic and ironically bigoted posting habits that they saw as alienating and unhealthy for the site, and what we could do to improve the situation. We genuinely didn't foresee the potential for a miscommunication of those statements as being bioessentialist, and want to extend our sincerest apologies for the misunderstanding.

Edit: Please feel welcome to post in c/gossip as you would have posted in the_dunk_tank, and in c/counterpropaganda as you would have posted in the_dredge_tank.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

i think we could perhaps do with a deeper discussion about the problems with the dunk tank. the name is easily changed, but it seems obvious to me that the real catalyst for this shitshow was the content of the tanks and obviously how this was described by mods. aside from the essentialist way the point was communicated, i think we actually need a proper discussion involving the community about what was wrong with the tanks and why mods thought this was the best solution. particularly if people are going to get their slop back.

i was not a tank poster and i do feel like i understand why the mods wanted to close the tanks, but i don't feel like the reasoning has been articulated well enough. and in terms of the community i feel like their defence of the tanks has been too personal to be constructive. i do understand the response, particularly from the people erased by the "cis-het white male" thing. but i feel like unless there can be a more constructive and less essentialist discussion on dunking, this isn't gonna get properly resolved.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think we need to let this cool down a bit first.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

yeah i agree. i don't mean like rn. but in order to actually move on i think that's gotta happen.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I agree with your sentiment but honestly I have low expectations for an actual cogent, meaningful, and well thought out argument being actually formed as to why low effort posting is bad and should be curtailed.

If the most focused push to change the culture has been...... .... this, I don't think there's some set of alternative discussions that would have convinced anyone that were being saved for later. Because if that was the case why didn't they use those instead of whatever the hell all this was?

Like sorry sometimes you only get one shot at convincing someone to your point of view and this was the attempt. It's over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i mean yeah, i do see your point. but i still think trying to discuss it seems important? my thought process is essentially: if the dunk tank mods voted to close the comm, then presumably they aren't up for modding it unless the issues are resolved some other way. so at the very least if people want their slop back some sorta discussion has to be had? or just new mods, act like nothing ever happened. that seems a bit empty.

i'm not saying there was a set of alternative discussions that would make everything clear. i'm more thinking the people behind this need to sit down, write up a coherent argument, post it, and invite the community to decide if there is any substance to it or not. then we decide how to proceed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i'm more thinking the people behind this need to sit down, write up a coherent argument, post it, and invite the community to decide if there is any substance to it or not. then we decide how to proceed.

Honestly they did that already. They wrote down their statement, and here we are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

well they need to do a better job. or if they can't then the community needs to do it instead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, a deeper discussion on this is forthcoming, but everyone needs a little bit of time to cool down before we have that conversation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago