this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
828 readers
59 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I know that being unhappy (as an individual) can lead to inhibition. Procrastination, addiction, escapism, doomerism etc. "Happy people" (whatever that means) do change things and are interested in change, but not necessarily in revolution.
I think a revolution can only happen if some people are so miserable that they have nothing to lose. Because the amount of people who aren't miserable, and are still willing to sacrifice their comfort to help working towards a goal greater than themselves is pretty low.
Is it more important to focus on the former or the latter type? idk!