this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
82 points (95.6% liked)

Games

16953 readers
340 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Steam being larger than all their PC competitors put together is certainly a problem, but I don't think it's a problem that's affecting the topic the article discusses. That seems to be an entirely different issue.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Its so interesting how averse all of lemmy (and reddit before) reacts when someone dares to challenge their dopamine fix.

Monopolies = bad

No two ways about it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

You've said nothing and refuse to elaborate.

Maybe the pushback isn't because you're criticising Steam but because your criticism lacks substance and you refuse to provide any.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

I honestly can't tell how your comment applies to what I said. Yes, monopolies are bad. That's why I said that Steam being so much larger than their competitors is a problem. I'm pretty sure we agree on that point, but your comment seems antagonistic and I don't know why.