this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
1234 points (98.4% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2268 readers
476 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So I'll bite ....let's say he's right and they're "not" homeless they're suffering from mental illness, drug addiction or a combination of both WHILE being homess.

Wouldn't it make more sense to actually fucking help those in need especially now we know they're struggling with homeless AND other incapacitating issues.

Society should be judged on how they treat the weak, struggling members of society. They are not a burden but real people hurting, and we are all closer to homeless than we think.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

There is also a cynical neoliberal argument that one could make. By helping those homeless people, they are reintroduced to the economy. They will produce value, consume products, and not dedicate on the sidewalk. In other words it's a good investment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So if I'm being honest, after reading Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein, I see absolutely no need to ever embrace anything from the Chicago School of Economics or any bullshit Neoliberal ideology, it only serves to transfer wealth to private hands.

Even when my objective and a Neoliberal objective inadvertently line up, they are not the good guys.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with you all the way. However, this is a very good talking point if you're dealing with someone who doesn't care about human decency or empathy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Then that person shouldn't be allowed to make any decisions regarding other people

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

And yet people like that do. Every single day. People like that are the dominant political force in this country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I hate that I'd even have to entertain that as a reason, or spew it at those who just won't care about any other argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

Yeah it gives me the ick too. But it's a very good talking point to someone who cares more about shareholder value than human life.