this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
1157 points (98.6% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2265 readers
752 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago

So-called genius can't fathom that in many cases the mental illness and drug addiction came from the homelessness.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I have anxiety and likely some deep seated depression that would rise up with a vengeance if I didn't have a warm home and access to food. I also love drinking wine, and while I do have access to said home and fridge, this wine hobby is cute and socially acceptable.

Make me homeless and I'd very much represent a mentally ill substance abusing human like Elmo is describing there. They're not 'them'; they're just us in a different reality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

If Elon suddenly became "homeless" he would have a sign begging for ketamine & screaming "put I never went to therapy on my tombstone".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They are drug addicts and mentally ill because usa has no safety nets for such people

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

We were supposed to take care of these people after de-institutionalization. We didn't.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/asylums/special/excerpt.html

We broke the promise and now it is their fault. What a bizarre world we live in.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

Republican playbook. Cheat, be an asshole and don't ever care for anyone else than yourself. Classy and on Brand

[–] [email protected] 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Zero is the amount of drug and alcohol rehabilitation centers that Elon has built. Zero is the amount of mental health facilities.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago

Zero is also the amount of mental health therapy Musk probably had, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Funny. So less public health would do what exactly to benefit the homeless/insane?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

There's full time employees that are homeless. Go out to a bridge, find a homeless person, ask how many homeless people they know that are working 40hrs a week. An alarming number. Looking forward to the violent end to elon musk. His violent games, have very violent ends.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Fucking dumbass. 25% of them are kids. Dude is a fucking loser.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Is this older or does his wealth just fluctuate +-100 billion as stocks fluctuate? Recently read he was at 450 billion.

What's crazy is losing or gaining 100 billion doesn't really affect him, he's still the richest person in the world and it wouldn't change his life any.

[–] [email protected] 163 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

Even if that is true, does it somehow invalidate the fact that they are also homeless?! Are they less deserving to be out of the elements because they have an addiction?

That's what I find so disgusting about this statement. It's just an excuse and doesn't address anything at all.

Using his own "argument", it would seem to me that a path to less addiction and violence would involve having a place to live and sleep.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Lots of people feel this way about homelessness and addiction. It's very easy to dehumanized people. My cousin interrupted me, when I said something about it, and told me "when you have people shooting up outside your house, then you can complain". As if i couldnt have an opinion until i experience the issue that is homelessness, the war on drugs, and our failure to address mental health issues in this country with my very own eyes. She's a bit snooty, and she doesn't even realize it.

Nevermind that once you become homeless, it becomes much harder to dig yourself out of that hole (probably by design).

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

It’s such a self-centered point of view. They can’t even conceive of themselves ever being in a similar situation so they assume the person inconveniencing them must be fully to blame for their homelessness. Then they can ignore those degenerates without feeling guilty about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah wonder what could drive someone to addiction and desperation? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm couldn't be not having a stable food supply and a place to live?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah the whole correlation causation thing is going to be very mixed up here. Like lets look at it another way:

Oh no I become disabled > Can’t work anymore shit I got no money > Try to apply for disability benefits oh fuck its a million forms and I need a lawyer oh fuck I’m broke > Crash at friends to apply for disability, first try fails after 1 year (this is pretty standard usually takes 2-3 trys), oh fuck friend kicks me out > go to homeless camp struggling to feed yourself, no time to think about applying for benefits anymore > The pain is too much I don’t have my medicine anymore its fucking freezing oh shit that guys selling drugs > get addicted

Boom, you’re homeless and addicted. That story could happen to literally anyone without generational wealth and an exceptionally strong support network.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

The guy who is so addicted with twitter engagement boostingbhis ego he bought it for himself just to go full fascist. Is calling homeless people addicts lol.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

The word “homeless” (without a home) literally as descriptive and neutral as possible. Elon Musk: Propaganda

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago

I was homeless for 6 years because billionaires fucked with America's housing market. I'm not even American.

I was 15 years old when that happened. My teenage years got robbed by billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aside from the fact that having a safe place to live alone helps both mental illness and substance abuse in most individuals, a major cause of homelessness is domestic abuse and being disowned. Having a safe place to live will absolutely help the over a third of domestic abuse victims who become homeless, and would help those who cannot afford to get away from their abusers due to lack of ability to find a safe haven.

Home the homeless, then we can start working on the harder parts.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A huge portion of the homeless population are orphans who age out of the system.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That too. There are so many reasons for homing the homeless first.

It's probably the cheapest and most effective first step. There's so much more that will need to follow it. There's a lot going on. But home the homeless first.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The entire system requires homeless people to exist as a threat to the working class.

Homeless will never get fixed for this reasons.

We can't even provide decent health care to the paying customers lol

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I cannot explain how disgustingly evil it is to witness the suffering of individuals, whether due to substance abuse, illness, or homelessness, and dismiss it as untruthful.

The numbers to fix homelessness may be controversial, with some sites saying it was 20 billion in 2010 and that's just to provide vouchers for a year, and some fact checking sites saying it can cost $60 billion in a year.

The primary concern is the actions of a South African billionaire, whose net worth is $350 billion. Instead of recognizing the complexities of a significant social issue, he appears to dehumanize those affected and assigns blame, rather than offering assistance.

What a fucking evil take.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

pretty sure you can't end homelessness with $20b unless we're talking about absolute homelessness or something..

[–] JasonDJ 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

There's a potential solution for less than $20B if they look towards their inspiration. I think they called it "Endlösung".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

That could be the cost to house people who are otherwise unhoused, aka “homeless”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

pretty sure you can’t end homelessness with $20b

The math is straightforward: Cost of a housing unit * number of unhoused people. Even assuming the extraordinarily inflated market rate for housing in 2024, $20B is more than enough to house 650k people.

Now, will the institutional actors that produced homelessness stop existing? Will we see an end to predatory lenders, robo-signed foreclosures, police harassment and civil asset forfeiture of the working poor, and unregulated real estate scammers targeting our most vulnerable neighbors? Probably not.

But we wouldn't have so many billionaires running about squandering our national wealth on vanity projects like Twitter without billions to be fleeced from the public to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

$20B is more than enough to house 650k people

I got curious, so I whipped out my phone's calculator. $20B/650k = $30,800, give or take. I truly don't know if that's enough to break the cycle of homelessness, but if it is that seems like a pretty low number. We spend 40x that number on the defense budget, which is totally a jobs program but it seems like fighting homelessness would also ultimately be a jobs program.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I wonder if they use drugs to cope with the mental illness they got from being forced to live on the streets?

Naw, that's pseudoscience. We all know that it's proven that poverty is a character trait that you actively choose. Not rich? Obviously you don't want it hard enough. /s

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago

Ketamine pot, calling the mentally ill kettle black.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Funny because elon is a drug addict who's showing he has some affective disorder because his daddy didn't love him and is a malignant narcissist.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait, I can't tell, is Elon talking about himself?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Homeless folks are generally no more violent than homed folks. Drug addiction and mental illness or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Completely ignoring that addiction is an illness.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

These are the defenders of Christianity in the US? Jesus would take the side of the richest man in the would and his gluttonous sack of pride sidekick as they attack immigrants, the homeless, and other marginalized people?

The guy who hung out with lepers, prostitutes and illiterate fisherman and attacked Rome and the Pharisees?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

YES. Anyone reposting Kyle's daily eviscerations on Lemmy is fine by me. Kyle's consistency through my years of watching Secular Talk has always been admirable, especially in this age of soulless online grifters

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Fuck Elon, but also there's absolutely zero chance you can solve homelessness with $20b unless you're just building tent cities with no other resources available there.

[–] JasonDJ 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I mean...you could really build rather modest dormitories outside of cities for not much money. Throw free bus rides into and out of the city (where jobs and social resources are) at it, and you've got not a solution, but a pretty damn good bandage to help people and families get (back) on their feet.

Hell, rent them on a sliding scale if so inclined. But the scale has to be $0 up until a decent income, like at least the first quintile.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

What til you find out about the number of unoccupied houses in the USA. Zero chance anybody is getting rich solving homelessness so we ain't doing it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

That assumtion is an annual cost. Although doing it for one year only would still probably reduce the homeless numbers considerably.

https://www.sciotoanalysis.com/news/2024/1/16/what-would-it-cost-to-end-homelessness-in-america

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›