this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
334 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
3 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Halved, in two years? Be realistic. Some random ass NPR article?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we're talking about validity of sources, NPR is a more trustworthy source than a shady investment site. You're not paying attention.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hm what's this?

Data Source: World Bank

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know, but what outlets does the World Bank get its data from for a given state? And why didn't you link TWB directly instead of going through macrotrends? Answer: You don't know what you're talking about, and you're not paying attention. troll

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And why didn’t you link TWB directly instead of going through macrotrends?

Cleaner and quicker presentation of data.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh wow a 0.5% difference! Those are the rounded values foolish tankie.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know lol but you still don't get to make that comment when you couldn't even find the data yourself you incompetent fool. Bernie would be very disappointed. troll

(Also the same entity that gave such data to TWB has this to say about China lmfao)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't care didn't ask. I linked the same data.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I don’t know why anyone is still bothering to reply to this very obvious CIA bot.

fedposting