this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
143 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15880 readers
447 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tweet

I wonder whats Stalin's take on how to deal with people with "conservative values"

In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.

J. Stalin

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Imagine thinking "the social" and "the economic" are two magically separate realms that don't intersect and about which you can have totally different beliefs, lol. Not just liberalism, but this sort of thinking goes back even deeper into "Western" thinking. This is the consequence of the "Western" metaphysical tradition. This is what understanding dialectics cures you of, but the hegemony of metaphysics that produces shit like this is what makes dialectics hard for people to understand.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Looking at society through a scientific lens, one would come to the conclusion that social values are a reflection of material conditions. Nobody just magically becomes a transphobic asshole, it's a successful redirection of anger towards fellow workers by the ruling class.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True. But that doesn't mean we should show any tolerance towards transphobia, racism, etc. Actual solidarity and support for total liberation for all is the only way to combat the divide and conquer strategy. All this patsoc shit has been tried before; I'd recommend reading Settlers, Black Bolshevik, George Jackson, and shit like that for good explanations of why it's a dead end.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I completely agree, just because someone's ignorance was taken advantage of doesn't mean we should infantilize them. Showing any toleration for their bigoted bullshit just gives merit to it. And thank you, I'll check those out

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How did Obama convince you to back down? What did comrade Chris Paul say about it?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Barrack threatened henceforth to cancel Taco Tuesday permanently. CPUSA is now a religious organization that channels its energy into getting Chris a ring before retirement

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agree on the philosophical point, Western metaphysics is rooted in a dead and non-dynamic worldview.

It's also fascinating to me that "Eastern" metaphysics still does get recognized by Westerners when it comes up, but only as an exotic curiosity. Even though it's based on a pretty normal and fundamental observation that things can be relative or change over time.

For example the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy pages on topics like human nature and free will are just categorizations of Western philosophers' positions. They even say they ignore other traditions on purpose lmao (how can you describe humanity without consulting humanity itself?). A naive young mind reads these things and assumes they need to pick one of the categories they're presented with, and that's the end of that

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Something that always infuriates me is when philosophy from other parts of the world gets dismissed as being just religion and not "properly philosophical." Like, thank god "Western" philosophy was always totally non-religious, amirite?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Economics departments in shambles