Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics.
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Counter argument: people have grown up with cars for over a century. Still, no one knows shit about cars where many have no clue about even filling it up by themselves let alone check things like radiator fluid, oil, etc.
People will be more accustomed to using tech, but that doesn’t mean the masses will know how it works.
Kek. Coolant.
I mean... It's not technically incorrect.
They weren't making an argument. They were asking a question. Still, if I assume their position is for or against the idea presented, I'm confused how this car example relates
Their argument centres around the assumption that people become knowledge and adept with technology that they are exposed to. I.E., people will be good with technology because they grew up with said technology. Or written more plainly, “John grew up using a computer so they must know that device intimately.”
The car example shows that’s not the case. That using, being around and generally living with cars has not made people more knowledgeable in their inner workings.
The point is you need to do more than just use or familiarize yourself with something to really understand its inner workings. Cars, toasters, microwaves, TVs. We all use the,, have grown up with them but still most of society has no clue how these things work. Ask people in your life to explain how a simple toaster works. The parts. What heats the bread? How does the power supply work. Hell ask them how many watts their toaster is. Hey, explain electricity, something all of have been privy too for generations now.
No one has mentioned knowing how something works except for you.. this feels like a tangent, however yeah I agree people should indeed try to understand the basics of the tech they depend on.
Sidenote: it's a sadly familiar feeling to get downvoted for such an innocuous comment as I was just now downvoted for...
You’re the only tangent here
I gave you the benefit of doubt, I shouldn't have.