It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
https://reddthat.com/comment/2027398
Comments are removed here on hexbear because our mods are awesome and banned that chud but if you want to see his bullshit its over there. He goes on to say that nonbinary identities are incompatible with gender abolition and shit.
Gonna say a number beyond any human comprehension (non-binary)
okay, here we go....
3
how about we go higher
100
a lot of people struggle decoupling gender = social norms, and in places where we don't have longstanding traditions or semiotics for other genders they're left with information about someone that doesn't mean anything to them.
and of course not fitting in society's boxes is kindof the point but these toddlers are looking for a neat conclusion and get mad when there isn't one.
01110111 01101000 01101111 01100001If you ask me, gender is actually a 4D spectrum.
A zero-dimensional understanding of gender is binary: you either have a p♂int, or you d♀n't.
Many people with a spectral understanding of gender can only see the first dimension, X, which is a simple line from man to woman. For them, this is a revolutionary concept, even though in reality this conception of non-binarity challenges old beliefs the least.
Some people will see the second dimension as well, Y, which goes from genderless to fully gendered. When I was questioning, I would see "gender quizzes" which used this type of still-rudimentary two-dimensional system.
Even fewer people will see the third dimension: as you travel through the Z axis, you will see that gender needs not be founded on genitals or societal conceptions of masculinity and femininity, but can be founded on anything. You are now entering the xenogender zone.
Finally there is the W axis, which is time, i.e. that gender is not static. You could conceive of a fifth dimension as well, which would be that gender is not necessarily predetermined, and you could conceive of even higher dimensions than that, but all that isn't really too necessary IMO.
In any case, with these four dimensions in place, one starts to see that gender extends infinitely in every direction, and that one's own gender needs not be a single fixed point (well, technically a straight line through the W axis), but can be a triangle, a spheroid, a tesseract, a klein bottle, literally any shape imaginable — and gender-space can even fold in on itself to create wormholes and apparently non-contiguous shapes.
Cis people's brains fry at trying to imagine all of this, in the same way that most anyone's brain would fry at trying to imagine ten-dimensional space. The long and short of it is that anything goes and it's pointless trying to quantify non-binary identities as simple coordinates.