this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
1273 points (98.4% liked)

Memes

45738 readers
645 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 370 points 1 year ago (4 children)

“You’re in contempt of court. You have been fined $x and continued refusal to swear the oath will land you in prison until you do. Jackass.”

That’s what the judge does.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's really a process of letting the subpoenaed know that they either tell the truth, lie and face perjury charges, or refuse and face contempt or court charges. The latter can seemingly land you in jail in perpetuity. Because fuck you, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does the "right to remain silent" still apply?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's mostly for police. Once you're in court and ordered to testify, the person talking about germany is mostly correct. You can't be forced to self-incriminate nor testify against a spouse. Otherwise yes. Generally 99% of courts won't bother even asking the defendant to testify because self-incrimination is practically guaranteed. Usually only if the defense calls on them, which is often a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Please state your name"

"I can't do that without incriminating myself"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Mr. Stealsalot,
We meet again

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just talked about Germany because I didn't knew how it is in the US. Apparently it's exactly the same. Intresting comment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Only if there’s a risk at incriminating yourself, and if it’s not immediately apparent how you’d run that risk (e.g. you’re a witness that doesn’t have a direct relation to the crime at hand) you’d have to motivate how it could be incriminating.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What if you were coerced into testifying?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago

Then you plead the 5th. Pretty sure that's exactly what it's intended for.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

You mean by a court subpoena? If so then you testify or get found in contempt of court.

Or do you mean what if someone is threatened/blackmailed into giving false testimony? If that's the case then you should probably go to the police. If it's law enforcement who are coercing you then I suppose you could try to include that fact in the testimony, but there may not be much difference in that and refusing to comply with the blackmailer in the first place, in terms of your safety.

If you're coerced to lie under oath then I'd guess that still counts as perjury, but I doubt most judges would be mad at you for it; they'd shit fury all over whoever was coercing you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You speak to your lawyer ahead of time and they discuss the issue with the judge.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If that's the best the judge can do, I feel sorry for them. And I will leave it at that.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

IDK, imprisoning a person until they either comply or the trial concludes without them seems pretty good for the judge. Bad for the person subpoenaed, but it's no skin of the judge's back

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I walk up to the goddamn judge and hand him my $25 dollars and say "Here's my money, now I am leaving!" And I left it at that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is it legal for them to just throw you in jail forever just for pissing off a judge? Why even pretend we have rights if that's how the system is going to operate?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because other people have a right to a speedy trial as well, and if you're intentionally holding up the court's time they're going to punish you.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's illegal to lie to the court. Even if all oaths weren't utterly worthless, one made under duress is inherently invalid. This one serves literally no purpose other than to psychologically dominate a person.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's just a more formal affirmation. Lots of people "promise" things they have no intention of really trying. It's a grander gestire for grander consequences.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it isn't. Oaths aren't "grand gestures," they're just silly. This one is worse than silly; it's the rough equivalent of a school bully putting you in a headlock and not letting you go until you agree to whatever bullshit he wants from you, and beating the shit out of you if you won't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a "grander gesture" (quote me correctly pls) than an informal promise with a friend. Do you consider signing a lease or a mortgage to be the rough equivalent of a school bully putting you in a headlock?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, because I can refuse to sign the lease and I won't get put in prison for that. Swearing a compulsory oath under threat of imprisonment in a sitiation you were forced to be in isn't any kind if gesture, it's just submission to coersion, nothing more, nothing less.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That doesn't give them the right to jail you indefinitely. This system lies and tells you we all have rights, but if they can just do that forever because you insulted or angered a judge, then you need to realize it is just a lie and we don't have rights. It's the same authoritarianism people fought and died to erase from the world. Judges can't be allowed to just do what they want.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By refusing to tell the truth to the court, you're basically refusing to take part in the trial. Which translates to you're refusing to take part in the justice system, yet also somehow wanting justice ... ??

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They aren't jailing you indefinitely just because you angered the judge. They might give you a few days if, again, you're just being an asshole or wasting time.

I've seen a lot of "Oh, judges can't be trusted" since Trumps indictments have rolled out. I wonder why that is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The conversation presupposes they will. Actually, that's exactly what the others were saying. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt, bro.

The legal system simply is illegitimate, and the fact that can happen is one of the Mt. Everest high pile of reasons why

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

the legal system fucks everyone, trumpies just don't want it to fuck their guy. It's like, welcome to the party guys lol.