rpg

3176 readers

1 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

Do not distribute pirate content
Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
Do not advertise for livestreams
Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
No Zak S content.
Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Not all games can or should be Burning Wheel, but every game can learn from it (www.runehammer.online)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hankerin Ferinale simplifies Burning Wheel down to three steps:

Map Relationships with Intent

Reinforce Relationships Again and Again

Build Massive, Compound Stakes on Dice Rolls

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm interested in a more in-depth how-to guide on running a game driven by player character Beliefs, Instincts, and Traits.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I find a simple way is to relinquish control of the game and let the players drive it. Once you, together with the group, have set up the Situation and Big Picture hand over the reins to the players. Saying

Ok, you have your Beliefs. Anyone wants to begin trying to achieve something?

It may be slow in the beginning, lots of questions and hesitation. But be a bit careful using this technique as it can devolve into a bunch of solo games. Nothing wrong with that but it may not be what you want.

Second method is a bit more directed. Between sessions look at beliefs that weren't touch upon and figure out a scene where you can drop the characters straight into. Or if your players are active and send you their new ones take one of them. Drop them straight in, no fuss, full in media res. If they want to poison the king drop them into the castle kitchens and ask them where they got the poison from. Use that information, with perhaps a test, to set up their immediate obstacle. I also call this the Blades method (as I've take it from Blades in the Dark).

Instincts and traits I seldom get a chance to actively engage when GMing, have so many other things going on then. Leave these things up the players.

Sometimes though it really helps to see how others do it. Jump into a few actual plays, I would skip around in their character burning sessions to see if their flavour warrants more in-depth dedication.