this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
1221 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59107 readers
5344 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is AFTER debloating all the MS bs as much as I can.

The amount of MS telemetry is just mindboggling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The other side of that is that the telemetry data never gives you a "why" of something.

For example, users might spend a long time at a screen because they are thinking about what to do, or they are confused by the options and can't figure out which option they need.

This is why a QA team coupled with a large amount of beta testers is invaluable and necessary.

Telemetry, in the context of software development and UX design, is either a decision by the misinformed or just an excuse to save costs by axing the Windows QA department.

In reality it's likely the data is being sold off. But in either case, that's data Microsoft isn't entitled to (from a moral/privacy perspective).

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For example, users might spend a long time at a screen because they are thinking about

... anything!

what am I gonna eat?

I should remember to feed the bicycle...

who stole my cat btw?

who am I to judge?

who am I?

what's the meaning of life?

what's the meaning of finding it?

what's the meaning of figuring out what the meaning is of finding it???

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

You forgot about the classic, "Where do you want to go today"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

what does unladen swallow even mean?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dammit! I forgot to feed my bicycle last night! No wonder it was at my bedroom door ringing its bell nonstop.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you recently had your cat stolen because you forgot to lock it before you went into the bike shop to get more food, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just couldn't get the lock looped properly. Cats do not obey the laws of physics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well, that's your hard lock!!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I replied elsewhere but YES! Telemetry is notorious for causing devs to hyperfocus on shit features due to their high usage. Just because a user is clicking X over Y doesn’t mean Y sucks and X is better. Maybe Y is in their periphery, or camouflaged by the background artwork or worded badly. But hey, since X gets a lot of clicks, it must be good, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Telemetry, in the context of software development and UX design, is either a decision by the misinformed or just an excuse to save costs by axing the Windows QA department.

That's very silly. That's actually such a ridiculous opinion I'm pretty sure you've left out some assumption that would make it make sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Telemetry is useful, but there is no accountability on how it's being used, so ultimately it could be used in bad faith and the average user wouldn't ever know.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

The other side of that is that the telemetry data never gives you a “why” of something.

Focus groups and customer surveys work really well for knowing the "why" of something