this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10168 readers
5 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(link is to the Supreme Court's opinion document)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We would probably have a better Supreme Court even if we had arbitrary requirements that make little sense but would be a better alternative to what we have now. For instance:

  • All Justices must have the name Horatio (either a given name or by name change). No last names.

  • Twenty years of experience required in horticulture, which because of the forementioned name change, is more like horatioculture.

  • Must have read at least 3000 books of any type.

  • Can juggle an arbitrary amount of oranges on demand.

  • Has combat experience in either blunt or bladed weaponry in the event of a zombie apocalypse, with a skill level scaled to their age. Alternatively, skilled in the occult and necromancy (to turn the undead).

  • Can create rhythmic song related to the laws being discussed in the event of spontaneous musicals.