It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
People are replying to his comment by saying they're gonna put his approval of them on their resumé.
The wiki page can currently be summed up with "Hamas is responsible because the US says so."
Comrade I get that this pisses you off and I'm right there with you and agree with your take at the top of this exchange. but the bookmarking the revision history of an article is genuinely useful. They're also pretty easy to browse. They still exist. What year were you doing your doctoral? 2015 for example? Then go to the last revision from 2015 of said article and bookmark that. It's not hard. Every article on there has a blue link at the top that says "version history." There's no reason to be rude to someone for their helpful suggestion. It doesn't make you a "grandma" or whatever. Anyway, if your grandma archived shit from the great depression, more respect to her.
When the articles are merged with a different topic as a redirect the original is gone forever
well that's a bummer. I'm sorry that happened. Sometimes when they're merged I think one of the articles maintains the original version history but I'm not 100% on that.