this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
143 points (88.6% liked)

World News

39161 readers
1861 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Along with the very real and violent war on the ground – there is also a fierce information war. Like Tuesday’s explosion at the Gaza hospital which Hamas says killed hundreds of people.

Israel says it was a misfired Islamic Jihad rocket, which they deny. Hamas says it was an Israeli airstrike, which they deny.

But tonight Forensic Architecture, Earshot and the Ramallah based NGO Al Haq have shared new information with Channel 4 News they say casts doubt on some aspects of Israel’s account."

The evidence is presented in the video

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does the investigation have to do with that though? It raises some great questions and shows that no war party shall be trusted in this information war.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From OPs text:

But tonight Forensic Architecture, Earshot and the Ramallah based NGO Al Haq have shared new information with Channel 4 News they say casts doubt on some aspects of Israel’s account."

To me this sounds like an advocate for Hamas which is unnecessary because there is no good hamas. Maybe excessive hatespeech here: https://lemm.ee/post/11191373 also made me just point that out again. There is no good Hamas and no need to talk to them, negotiate with them or just even verify any of their misinformation - they are nothing but terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

or just even verify any of their misinformation

I'm sorry, but I will not blindly trust any kind of information, no matter if it's from Hamas, the IDF, or the Pentagon. Why would you even mind that open source investigators are looking at this? If you are so sure that what hamas are saying is misinformation, then you should be totally happy that even more open source investigators are looking into it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

does anything you just wrote make sense?

so you will not "blindly" trust any info, right? and you are upset because there is more informatiom?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe you need to take a second read then. Or at least look under what post you're even discussing.

To you, independent investigators looking into events without involving any war party is "supporting Hamas". That's a very, very interesting position you have there and shows a great bias. Again, how did you connect the two points? What's wrong with having open source investigators look into these events? Why is that "supporting Hamas"?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i do not think a thousand teacher can help you comprehend text.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Ad Hominem attacks instead of answering the question. Please answer the question