this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
88 points (90.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26238 readers
1250 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm in the US.

I haven't discerned a pattern, by the media, in the titling of the horror currently underway.

I've seen Al Jazeera use both phrasings. I haven't determined that other media sites are hardlining their terminology either, but I notice the difference as I browse.

Maybe it doesn't mean anything, but these days people seem extra sensitive about names.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Whoever thinks Israel purposefully targets civilians ignores how Hamas operates. It has been documented for years by the UN and human rights organizations that they use civilians as shields.

Getting Palestinian civilians dead is part of their strategy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's also entirely unfair to the long standing apartheid state Israel has run against Palestinians. Push anyone long enough and they push back.

Kids throw rocks? Fuckin execute them, according to the IDF.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I’m not defending Israel settlements in the West Bank.

But that’s largely independent from Hamas actions or intentions. Hamas was founded before the first intifada, and it existed at relatively peaceful times when the talks about a two state solution were meant serious on the Israeli side. Their intentions then were not different from today’s.

Hamas never wanted peace, and they never wanted to peacefully coexist.

(*) edit: wait did you say me pointing out how Hamas uses civilians as shields is unfair against the Hamas??

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I had a problem with your opener:

whoever thinks Israel purposefully targets civilians...

They have for a while, and currently they are. And it's well known and historically proven that behavior like that results in backlash eventually. And then nothing good happens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

they currently are

You didn’t read the follow up after my opening that you had problems with.

Or you are ignoring how Hamas operates.

The claim that Hamas reacts to anything that Israel does in the West Bank is a myth.