this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
147 points (87.3% liked)

News

23284 readers
3576 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 115 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Fta: "It’s a one-sided bet,” said John Y. Campbell, a Harvard economist who has argued that the 30-year mortgage contributes to inequality. “If inflation goes way up, the lenders lose and the borrowers win. Whereas if inflation goes down, the borrower just refinances.”

Yeah won't someone think of those poor lenders who make...let's check my notes....130% on their investment or more over the 30 years and it is amortized so you pay the most interest up front in the first decade? Even if you refi you still start that interest over and pay thousands in closing costs to the bank on top of it.

Waahhhhhh Cry me a fucking river.

Lmfao The reason rate are locked is obvious.
Why should I lose my home because interest rates changed and your mtg goes up 40%?

That's what happens with 5 -15 year loan terms.
A buddy in the UK is facing this now. Because he can't get a 30 year loan and can't pay off his house he's forced to restrcture and his payment is going from $800 to $1300.

Man look at all that inequality defeated just like the article says it would be...not.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And the lenders don’t lose at all! They borrow the money at current rates, and immediately package it off to a mortgage backed security and sell it within weeks of closing. The only potential “loser” is the investor that buys the security, but that’s just the nature of investing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only potential “loser” is the investor that buys the [mortgaged backed security], but that’s just the nature of investing.

You say that, but we don't have to allow that kind of predatory shit to exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's actually a mechanism to inject more liquidity to the market. And therefore allow more loans, for more people.

The opposite would mean rates would for sure increase because there would be very limited pool of capital to be loaned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You say that as if we didn't have mortgages at reasonable rates back in the day before mortgage-backed securities were invented.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I didn't quite say that. I said it would be limited from now on.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Yeh this is just thinly veiled propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Came here to say the same thing. What a bullshit article.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Don't forget that your buddy has enjoyed years of super cheap mortgage unseen in the US.