Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
The fact that reddit and its subreddits became huge echo chambers that downvote and challenge anything that isn't the current public opinion.
The problem is that it's just inherent in a community. It can, and probably will, happen here at some point and probably already has to some extent. People will naturally gravitate towards like minded "in-groups" and, given enough time, that will expand into its own echo chamber.
I think it might help to differentiate "I disagree" and "I don't like this" downvotes from "this thing is a waste of resources" or "I don't care what this person has to say, they are an asshole that I don't want to interact with" ones. Comment filtering should use the latter rather than the former.
Allowing controversial comments to still be a part of the conversation without a "this isn't popular!" target painted on them might avoid the echo chamber effect while still giving users a way to passively disagree.
I embrace the downvotes. Sometimes the unpopular opinion happens to be right.
You are upset that popular opinion favors things which are... popular?
I don't think they are upset just could do without it
It's not that, it's more that usually comments that are heavily downvoted get hidden and so see less real discussion, plus reddit starts rate-limiting you when you're heavily downvoted.
Lemmy seems to be better in that I might get downvoted, which is fine I don't give a fuck, but you don't get limited so you can still reply and have discussions.
Can't say I ever experienced that in fifteen years on the site.