this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
63 points (95.7% liked)

Australia

3511 readers
81 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal Coalition has declared at the Cop28 climate summit that it will back a global pledge to triple nuclear energy if the opposition leader, Peter Dutton, becomes prime minister, but will not support Australia tripling its renewable energy.

Speaking on the sidelines of the conference in Dubai, the opposition’s climate change and energy spokesperson, Ted O’Brien, also said a Coalition government would consider supporting Generation III+ large-scale nuclear reactors, and not just the unproven small modular reactors it has strongly touted.

The statement at the global summit confirmed the Coalition was on a markedly different path to Labor. The Albanese government last week joined more than 120 countries in backing a pledge to triple renewable energy and double the rate of energy efficiency by 2030, but did not sign up with 22 countries that supported tripling nuclear power by 2050.

While only 11% of countries at the talks – mostly nations that already have a domestic nuclear energy industry – backed the nuclear pledge, O’Brien declared “Cop28 will be known as the nuclear Cop”

[. .]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Weren't you idiots the ones who brought coal into the parliament office and we're brandishing it as "clean"?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact the coal prop used was washed and sealed with a coat of lacquer

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/our-coal-fondling-pm-switches-his-prop-to-gas-but-is-anything-really-different-20200918-p55ww9.html

“As was pointed out at the time, the coal must have been lacquered – touching raw coal covers you in black dust. Morrison didn’t want to get his hands dirty. “

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

According to this article, the lump of coal was supplied by the Minerals Council. If I recall correctly, it was one of their exhibits, so it had been sealed for that purpose. They didn't specifically prep a fresh lump of coal just so he could take it into the chamber.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Here’s one we prepared earlier…

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Wonder if they'll do the same stunt with uranium

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Lmao that's like when one of the awful US senators of the state of Oklahoma (basically like Texas and Florida but worse) brought a snowball onto the Senate floor as 'proof' that 'global warming isn't a thing.' How absolutely ridiculous. I'm sorry you guys have to deal with nonsense like that, too.